Home » Will the truth make itself “known in deeds” – and will it happen in time to prevent disaster?

Comments

Will the truth make itself “known in deeds” – and will it happen in time to prevent disaster? — 18 Comments

  1. The problem with censorship, as John Stuart Mill pointed out a century and half ago, is that it makes it impossible for those who impose it to discover that they are wrong.

    –Roger Scruton

    neo: That’s a brilliant bit! Thanks.

  2. “if so many people weren’t blinded by the incessant propaganda of the left, supported and spread by the MSM and the school system …”

    There are many things to be upset about. Still, in my view, if I could only change one thing it would be the media.
    I truly believe that there is much that would self-heal if only the media came anywhere near to being fair.

  3. JimNorCal:

    I completely agree.

    I actually think “fake news” is too trivial a term for it. I’m not good at coming up with catchy names, but what it is is Big Lies and Orwellian propaganda of great cleverness and unity of purpose.

  4. neo/anyone: Where’s a good place to start with Roger Scruton?

    So many books, links. So little time.

  5. neo:

    Your observation on whether or not we have enough time is correct. I do not have a good feeling about the upcoming election. Unfortunately for all of us, except the thugs, we just may have run out of time.

  6. Tommy Smother, “The only valid form of censorship is the right to not listen.”

    The left seeks the one ring, an authoritarian state that is willing to murder tens of millions who refuse to kowtow. Yes they hate djt, but they hate we deplorables more. They are not my fellow countrymen, they are my enemy. They need to flee to their imaginary utopia, STFU, or die.

  7. The Truth will certainly make itself known.

    But … not necessarily in your, mine, nor anybody living today’s lifetime.

    Skynet / robo-authority, will never be able to take over from a freedom loving, free-speech loving society.

    But now I’m imagining a China-like total drone surveillance society of lazy, comfy poverty for almost all — the men get paid $15/hr to play video games all day long.

    Lots of folk accept this. It comes to support some “social justice”. It stays because … robots. Including sex-bots who give as many orgasms as desired (better than The Orb in Woody Allen’s Sleeper).

    “You and me babe.
    How about it?”
    (Mark Knopfler at Madison Square Garden, 2019 – he was also in Bratislava!
    didn’t go, tho. 🙁 ) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xF_gCy-4y3w

    Comment:
    I remember my wife and I going to visit my sister and her husband. And we were all sitting around outside in front of his garage and he says, “Man…you’ve got to hear this.”
    So he goes inside and cranks his stereo and I hear ‘The Sultans of Swing’ for the first time.
    “Who the f**k is that!” I say.
    “Dire Straits”, he tells me.
    “Who?”

    That was over 40 years ago…and it is one of those memories that is as clear as if it was yesterday.
    Thanks, Mark!

    Thanks, Huxley, for Scruton. On beauty.
    Conservatives love beauty. Far more than Originality.
    Beauty is like virtue, and originality is like cool.
    Democrats prefer cool. Which is often more photogenic in movies, but not a good ideal.

  8. Europe is a fait accompli.
    The US has only a small chance of escaping complete Democratic takeover in November. Then borders will not exist, mail vote fraud will be normal, doctors will no longer practice (they will all be drafted into Federal service), all meds will be from Ezekiel Emanuel-controlled Federal pharmacies (to avoid inessential drugs for the elderly), the thought police will be everywhere, and Modern Monetary Theory will prevail (to H with deficits, gotta have guaranteed annual income, more for blacks because of oppression).

  9. I went to this post for the headline, and stayed for the essay that captures the difference between the Left and conservatives (I’ve quit using the mislabeling of “liberal” or even “progressive” – since they are not either one).

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/06/08/extreme-cringe-speaker-nancy-pelosi-unites-the-new-black-pander-party/

    So people who believe in leftist ideologies seek control as a means of trying to create guarantees and safeguards against those circumstances they fear. Liberals try to control the world and people to enable their comfort and happiness. Which, as we know, is an endless quest. Trying to control others does nothing in the way of making oneself happy. By extension, voting in this mindset so that government can try to control others will also – shocking – not lead to a happier, more comfortable life.

    The conservative (and moderate, independent, but for the sake of expediency, the conservative), on the other hand, relies on himself to meet his own needs.

    The conservative understands that not only is it a waste of time to try to control you, it’s actually impossible. Humans were born to be free. And if we put a roadblock in front of you, you’ll find another way around it. So we see attempts at control as a waste of resources, energy and time at best, and at worst, creating detrimental results that serve to hinder people’s upward mobility or teach dependence. We see much more efficiency, as well as endless opportunity, in leaving you to your own devices; and we want the same in return.

    This is where leftists falsely narrate conservatives as heartless; but really, the conservative believes that there is one and one path only to sustainable success and independence – and that is self-empowerment.

    The conservative believes in abundance. The liberal believes in scarcity.

    The conservative believes man is born free and will be who he is, no matter what arbitrary limitations or rules are put on him. The liberal believes man is perfectible, and by extension, believes a society at large is perfectible, and command and control is justified in the quest to a “perfect” utopian society. (Sounds familiar!)

    The leftist believes the system must be perfected in order to enable success. Therefore disappointment is channeled as anger and blame at the system. Voids are left to be filled by faith in the govt, which they surely then want to come in and “fix” things.

    And therein lies the roots of love and fear respectively. For the conservative, when life presents great struggles, she knows she has the power to surmount them. Happiness stems from internal strength and perseverance.

    For the leftist, when life presents great struggles, the system failed, therefore they were at the mercy of a faulty system, and they believe that only when the system is fixed can their life improve. Happiness is built on systemic contingencies, which they will then seek to control or expect someone else to.

    One blames himself. The other blames anyone and everyone but himself.

    And there it is. There’s where the meanness comes from. The leftist ideology causes that person to cast anger at the world when things go wrong or appear “unfair.” She constantly chooses only to see the “injustices” – and that makes for a very miserable, mean, blame-casting existence.

  10. Words and deeds.

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/06/06/anger-games-economic-rebound-antithetical-to-the-class-warfare-plan/

    The media apoplexy over stunningly positive economic news is directly related to how much damage a positive economy does to the Antifa/BLM strategy to divide our nation through class warfare. A thriving Main Street economy is antithetical to the objective.

    A thriving Main Street means an expanding U.S. middle-class. As the middle-class expands it becomes more difficult to organize outrage based on division.

    Part of the reason why limo-liberal elites have been successful politicians through the years is the outcome of their economic policy inherently creates a wider gap between the haves and have-nots. This divide allows politicians to control apportioning.

    Exploiting the gap, essentially exploiting class warfare as a political strategy, is the fuel that drives identity politics. Ergo all progressive economic policies, the offshoring of jobs; the policies that support Wall Street and globalism etc; are designed to weaken the U.S. middle-class while making rich people more affluent, and poor people more dependent.

    Many people call for a third party in politics without realizing President Trump represents the first second party DC has seen in decades. That’s why he is opposed by both wings of the same legislative bird.

    Main Street and the freedom within the free market is a problem for command and control economic systems.

    It is much harder to create outrage over a wealth gap when the workforce is seeing increased wage growth. In that scenario, the voices who live on the fuel of class warfare are ignored.

    All of the current U.S. antagonism is dependent on the class struggle. If the police are defunded only the wealthy will have access to police.

    The same process is true for healthcare, housing and a host of economic measures. If a person can independently afford to access these sectors, those who construct the system of controlling, dividing and apportioning the benefits become irrelevant.

    The media outrage over the positive economic data today is indicative of their concern the economy will quickly rebound; and that means diminished influence for the politicians the media are in position to support.

    The current protest movement is reliant upon the class struggle as the primary narrative underpinning the need for protest leadership. Abundance is against their interests.

    The far left is hoping to curtail the strength of the economy; that’s why the blue state governors are fighting against reopening. However, the organized protests of thousands of people gathering together have made their best COVID shutdown arguments moot.

    The professional grievance operators have a very narrow window to achieve their objective, and that desperation is starting to show in how severe they are pushing to create division before the economy restarts. Every social justice protest movement has been activated and Antifa footsoldiers are attempting to sow chaos.

    With the COVID nonsense collapsing at the same time the currency of the race-card is exhausting, what are they going to do after that?

    I’m kind of afraid to see the answer to that last question.

  11. https://twitter.com/Ymarsakar/status/1270320522568650752?s=20

    I have shifted to Ymar’s world and Ymar’s course. So I am collecting my debriefings there, hosted by Grim. Twitter is nice for grasping the emotional state of humanity and the President (Trump) uses it too, but it can’t hold the density of information required. Other people have done videos enough that I have the links to them by now, but I’ll use a simpler format and structure.

  12. Recommended for All Here:

    “The War On Cops”

    By (The Great)
    Heather MacDonald
    (2016)
    __________________
    I listened to Dennis Prager interview Heather yesterday & immediately ordered the book for
    Single $-Dollars from eBay. I have read her wonderful, “The War On Boys”.

  13. This may be tangential; and I may be late to the table.

    But, I wonder how many people are aware that the martyr George Floyd spent five years in prison for armed robbery, and had another conviction for theft with a fire arm? (Don’t know the resolution of the second conviction.)

    I am only aware of this because I did a Duck Duck Go search on the statement by the Police Union spokesman that Floyd was a violent criminal. It turns out the the NY Post had reported it; but, I have seen nothing else.

    This parallels the lack of reporting that the police were actually responding to a 911 call that Floyd was intoxicated and out of control. (Turns out that he had meth and fentanyl in his system). Reports have generally said the police accosted him simply for passing a bogus $20 bill. Not true.

    All of this makes me wonder what might have transpired that the viral video does not show. Maybe someday the cops will be able to elaborate if they survive long enough in the climate of hate that has been manufactured.

  14. Neo:
    I have my doubts that it’s showing itself in time. Or perhaps it’s more correct to say that it would be in time, if so many people weren’t blinded by the incessant propaganda of the left
    ———–
    One other result of “cancel” style censorship/denunciation is that those in power have no idea how many people disagree with them, but are hunkering/cowering. I think many Americans are still lip-syncing Liberal slogans and striking poses they have been told are fashionable (and safe) – but will vote based on reality.

    Read Dalrymple’s famous account of how Glasnost precipitated a rapid collapse of Soviet authority. People who’d gone through life feeling that they were the only ones who felt something was wrong suddenly knew that millions thought as they did. The power of the Soviets to impose anything on the populace devolved pretty quickly.

    Trump’s election was a Glasnost moment. People who knew in their guts that the politics of racial preferences and sexual identity were oppressive nonsense, that the radicals had gone off the rails, suddenly saw that millions of people voted against what “everybody knew” to be Good and Progressive.

    The Left has spent much of its time since trying to stuff the genie back in the bottle, and to shore up its authority with even more extreme claims and shriller attack (call it the “pay to attention to that man behind the curtain” tactic). Unfortunately for them, this has revealed their true nature even more – accelerating the Glasnost effect.

    It seems they are now moving into a more dangerous attempt to incite a real revolution.

    But millions of Americans will not be induced to forget what they’ve learned. And they know that millions of their neighbors agree with them. No pollster will be able to measure this group until they step into a voting booth. But I think they will be… huge.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>