↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home 1 2 3 … 1,882 1,883 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post

Roundup

The New Neo Posted on May 11, 2026 by neoMay 11, 2026

(1) Could Spencer Pratt become mayor of LA? Conventional wisdom says “no,” but there’s nothing conventional about Pratt. If he motivates turnout among LA voters unhappy with Democrat rule, I think there’s a remote possibility he could win.

Meantime, is this anti-Pratt ad for real? There’s a lot of online discussion about that. It’s hard to believe it is real, because it’s so tone-deaf:

? NOW: Leftists are being brutally mocked for DROPPING THIS “attack ad” on LA Mayor candidate Spencer Pratt — which says he opposes rampant homelessness and supports the police

LMAO — and they’re spending hundreds of thousands to blast this everywhere! ?

“Pratt says it's time… pic.twitter.com/VYLB2QSUPD

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 10, 2026

It was apparently released by the LA County Federation of Labor.

(2) Virginia Democrats floated a plan to retire all the Virginia Supreme Court justices by passing a special bill with a new retirement age of 53, retroactive. This has been nixed; among other things, they ran out of time. But even thinking of it for a single moment shows what Democrats are prepared to do if they ever get control of the federal government again. I’ve written about that many times – getting rid of safeguards of voting security, statehood for Puerto Rico and DC (the latter through various arcane machinations), open borders again, amnesty – in order to solidify their own power.

(3) Keir Starmer says he isn’t going anywhere, and in fact plans to stay for ten years if possible. Guy can’t take a hint, like a stalker:

Keir Starmer has said he wants a decade in Downing Street and will fight anyone who challenges him for the Labour leadership.

The prime minister described his government as a “10-year project of renewal”. Asked whether he would definitely lead his party into the next general election and serve a full second term, he said: “Yes, I will.”

(4) More grift by NGOs.

(5) Terrible airplane death – a man trespasses onto the tarmac into the path of a flight in the process of landing. Fortunately, no one on the airplane died.

Posted in Uncategorized | 22 Replies

The scope of Medicaid corruption: Ohio

The New Neo Posted on May 11, 2026 by neoMay 11, 2026

Most people who aren’t hopelessly naive were aware that there is corruption involving government and its various handouts. But I certainly had no idea of its enormous scope until the last year or so.

Here we have what’s been going on in Ohio with the Medicaid home health program – and more revelations still to come. The most shocking thing about it, I think, is how easy it is to see, and how little oversight was being applied:

The front doors are open, but inside, the seven massive complexes appear to be largely abandoned. Smoke detectors chirp for new batteries. No one is there to change them. Some office doors have signs suggesting the owner is out to lunch, but the piles of mail outside tell a different story. Stray cats have taken up residence in the parking lots.

The government is under the impression that all of the office buildings hold thriving health care businesses. …

In all, the Cordoba-owned buildings in Columbus housed 288 businesses registered with Medicaid, The Daily Wire investigation found. Together, they charged taxpayers more than a quarter of a billion dollars between 2018 and 2024. That’s in a city where only 6,273 people 75 or older are on Medicaid.

The Medicaid program has exploded in Ohio thanks to a waiver that expanded the medical program to include wide-ranging at-home services such as “homemaking,” allowing taxpayer money to be spent for tasks such as making the bed or working on a hairdo.

Ohio has 3,700 companies with “Home Health” in their name, according to a review of Ohio business records. In particular, it’s blown up in Columbus, which is home to the second-largest Somali population in the United States. The program has little oversight, with most of the so-called care happening inside individual homes, making it susceptible to fraud and abuse. …

Yet the home health businesses have been established as if by a machine, with some sharing nearly identical signs that suggest coordination rather than rivalry.

The authors managed to find one business that seemed to actually be operating and interviewed someone in the office (the owner’s son), who said that 70% of their clients were family members providing for family members. He added:

Asked why people wouldn’t simply help their aging parents without billing Medicaid, he said, “Well if the government will pay you to do it … it’s an incentive. I think most people nowadays, they don’t really care as much.”

You can find a tremendous amount of detail at the link.

Vivek Ramaswamy, who’s running for governor in Ohio, is making promises to crack down on this if he’s elected:

“We’re going to have to take a deep, hard look at the way the $40-plus billion in state Medicaid dollars are being spent,” Ramaswamy told “Saturday in America” host Kayleigh McEnany.

“I think the right answer is any instance of waste, fraud, abuse… deserve[s] to be prosecuted, and we intend to investigate them aggressively, as well as to prosecute aggressively, to send a deterrent signal that our government is not a piggy bank, the taxpayer is not a piggy bank to be bilked.”

Some piggy bank.

Posted in Finance and economics, Health | 8 Replies

Iran again – plus TDS

The New Neo Posted on May 11, 2026 by neoMay 11, 2026

In a development that should surprise no one, Iran responded to the latest US offer and Trump has declared it “totally unacceptable” (in all caps):

“I have just read the response from Iran’s so-called ‘Representatives.’ I don’t like it — TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

The president also warned the country against “playing games” after Tehran refused to discuss its nuclear program in its latest response to America’s peace proposal through Pakistani mediators.

Trump slammed the rogue Mideast country for delaying negotiations historically, ranting on the social platform.

“Iran has been playing games with the United States, and the rest of the World, for 47 years (DELAY, DELAY, DELAY!” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.

Iran reportedly offered some small possible concessions on its nuclear program and nuclear material, but nothing close to what the US is demanding, and only after fighting ends and the Strait opens.

So, what now? Those who trust Trump believe he’s got a plan. Those who have contempt for him believe he’s in over his head and is just flailing around. I am one of those who think there’s a plan, and some of it involves the increased economic pressure on Iran that’s been going on for quite some time, plus the current ceasefire that resets the time schedule for the need for Congressional approval. Beyond that I cannot say.

This idea that Trump’s planfulness or lack thereof is in the eye of the beholder is perfectly illustrated in this short clip I’ve cued up of Sam Harris, someone who generally is quite clear-eyed on the topic of Iran and Islamic jihadism and the need to defeat it, but who hates Trump with the heat of a thousand suns and therefore can give him no credit for anything. As with so many Trump-haters, Harris fairly drips with contempt for Trump, and makes assertions about him (and the US and Europe) that I find preposterous but that I’ve heard from friends of mine who are Trump-haters:

NOTE: Harris also gets what Trump said about Ukraine “starting it” wrong; I happen to have written a post on the subject and you can find it here.

Posted in Iran, Trump, War and Peace | 18 Replies

Open thread 5/11/2026

The New Neo Posted on May 11, 2026 by neoMay 11, 2026

Posted in Uncategorized | 31 Replies

Happy Mother’s Day!

The New Neo Posted on May 10, 2026 by neoMay 10, 2026

[NOTE: This is a slightly-edited repeat of my traditional Mother’s Day post. It was written while my mother was still alive.]

Okay, who are these three dark beauties?

A hint: one of them is one of the very first pictures you’ve ever seen on this blog of neo, sans apple. Not that you’d recognize me, of course. Even my own mother might not recognize me from this photo.

My own mother, you say? Of course she would. Ah, but she’s here too, looking a bit different than she does today—Mother’s Day—at ninety-eight years of age. Just a bit; maybe her own mother wouldn’t recognize her, either.

Her own mother? She’s the one who’s all dressed up, with longer hair than the rest of us.

The photo of my grandmother was taken in the 1880’s; the one of my mother in the teens of the twentieth century; and the one of me, of course, in the 1950s.

Heredity, ain’t it great? My mother and grandmother are both sitting for formal portraits at a professional photographer’s studio, but by the time I came around amateur snapshots were easy to take with a smallish Brownie camera. My mother is sitting on the knee of her own grandfather, my grandmother’s father, a dapper gentleman who was always very well-turned out. I’m next to my older brother, who’s reading a book to me but is cropped out of this photo. My grandmother sits alone in all her finery.

We all not only resemble each other greatly in our features and coloring, but in our solemnity. My mother’s and grandmother’s seriousness is probably explained by the strange and formal setting; mine is due to my concentration on the book, which was Peter Pan (my brother was only pretending to read it, since he couldn’t read yet, but I didn’t know that at the time). My mother’s resemblance to me is enhanced by our similar hairdos (or lack thereof), although hers was short because it hadn’t really grown in yet, and mine was short because she purposely kept it that way (easier to deal with).

My grandmother not only has the pretty ruffled dress and the long flowing locks, but if you look really closely you can see a tiny earring dangling from her earlobe. When I was young, she showed me her baby earrings; several miniature, delicate pairs. It astounded me that they’d actually pierced a baby’s ears (and that my grandmother had let the holes close up later on, and couldn’t wear pierced earrings any more), whereas I had to fight for the right to have mine done in my early teens.

I’m not sure what my mother’s wearing; some sort of baby smock. But I know what I have on: my brother’s hand-me-down pajamas, and I was none too happy about it, of that you can be sure.

So, a very happy Mother’s Day to you all! What would mothers be without babies…and mothers…and babies….and mothers….?

Posted in Me, myself, and I | 5 Replies

Mother’s Day is tomorrow

The New Neo Posted on May 9, 2026 by neoMay 9, 2026

[NOTE: And in honor of the occasion, I’m reposting this essay from 2021.]

One of the tasks that fell to me since my mother’s death years ago was to go through her papers and photos.

Some “getting rid of” candidates were obvious. Medical records, of which my mother kept very many. Not needed any more, now that she was gone. Ditto her lists of things to do, address and appointment books, and random jottings.

But the rest! A few letters from me in high school and college. Greeting cards. At least a hundred letters from my father when they were dating in the late 30s when he was traveling constantly while working for the government as a lawyer. Those tend to take the form of descriptions of cities and small towns visited, but here and there are some more personal nuggets. A scrapbook of clippings about her activities in the community. A similar one made by her mother my grandmother, and one compiled by her grandfather my great-grandfather. That last one contains his wedding invitation, circa 1883.

Yearbooks. As an only child of an only child, my mother also inherited all the family photos going back to Civil War times and earlier. Some are of people I knew but many lovely ones are of the total strangers who must be my ancestors, and whose identities are lost.

Sorting them out has been time-consuming, and the task is still incomplete many years later. But I try, especially with those things that seem of special interest.

For me that includes my mother’s writing – because she was a writer too, an essayist whose work was often published in local newspapers and who’d written poetry as a precocious child and young woman. I had seen many of her poems and essays before, but some were new to me.

Here’s an essay of my mother’s that I found and read for the first time about a year after her death. I thought it might be fun to publish it on the blog; I don’t think that would have bothered her in the least. It appears to be something she wrote at the age of 80 (during the 1990s) for a writing workshop in response to an exercise staged by the teacher. It’s written in longhand, with various cross-outs, but I’m impressed with how few corrections she had to make in the flow of her thoughts, and how graceful her expression was under the circumstances.

And she seemed to like the dash, too—just like me.

It appears that the teacher had played music for the class, lit some candles, and given the students a sheet of guidelines (these were not saved; I have a hunch my mother didn’t think too much of them), telling the students to write for a few minutes. Here’s what my mother produced:

80 years of living has immunized me somewhat to candles, music, and yes, even meditation—so I looked with a somewhat jaundiced eye at first on Guidelines—and what strikes me at once is the word “Proprioceptive”—what does it mean and where does it come from?

Isn’t that awful—but I do like words and I keep wondering about that one—

The music is delightful and I wonder what is making me put words on a yellow legal pad anyway—and why am I resistant—

Probably because I tend to have used humor as a shield all my life—it helped me overlook hurts, and raise children without going crazy, and a laugh has been like medicine—the best for me.

As an only child I looked for friends—-and it helped me acquire them and saw us through good days and bad.

My husband liked a “light view”—but now it is more difficult because people are different—more violent, angry, and sad. I cling to humor—if and when possible—and its not always possible anymore to find it.

Why am I writing about fun and laughter when I could pick anything? Perhaps it keeps me sane when the alleged golden years have crept up and facing the inevitable is too much. Like Scarlett O’Hara—if it’s unpleasant “I’ll think about that tomorrow”—

Writing fiction is almost impossible for me because “truth is stranger than.” Coincidence, friendships, travels, the endless variety in people who cross your life are enough—there is little laughter these days and I plan to hold onto just as much as possible.

Now I have made a neat ending but the time is not up and the music and candles are still with me—and with them go gratitude for good luck and good health and the ability to cope with what comes—so far so good.

My mother and I were temperamentally very different, although we both liked humor. One of the things we shared was writing, and perhaps that’s why her essays mean a lot to me. I was especially struck in this one by her saying she couldn’t write fiction. I’ve written quite a few short stories, but they’re not my natural genre and I gave up writing fiction about fifteen years ago and it’s been essays ever since.

Some of my earliest writing memories involve my mother helping me write. She was a fabulous typist (she could even use carbons, and boy was she fast on a manual!) and a good editor. When we were young, my brother and I would leave our essays for her to read and correct for grammar errors, and she knew what she was doing.

My mother was also an excellent natural untrained dancer. But even though my mother couldn’t really sing, when I saw Bebe Daniels in the movie “42nd Street” on TV as a child, I was transfixed because the actress reminded me so very much of my mother. Here’s Bebe:

bebeDaniels

And here’s my mother, at the time of her graduation from college:

JGraduation

I thought everyone had an editor for a mother. I thought everyone had a mother who could write. Turns out they don’t.

Posted in Me, myself, and I | 8 Replies

Obama meets with the Canadian PM

The New Neo Posted on May 9, 2026 by neoMay 9, 2026

Obama is in Canada in order to give the keynote speech to a group called Canada 2020, which has the goal of furthering “a more just, inclusive and forward-thinking Canada.”

That’s “just” as in “social justice” or what Thomas Sowell called “cosmic justice.” I guess the Canadian left just isn’t satisfied with the present status quo, nor is Obama.

He also met with PM Carney, which – according to Newsweek – has MAGA “seething” (rather than pouncing, as is customary).

Carney wrote:

“Welcome back to Canada, President @BarackObama,” Carney wrote. “Thank you for joining us in Toronto for important conversations on how we can build a better and more just future—and empower more people to build with us.”

There’s that “just” business again.

I’m not seething about this; there are plenty of more seethable things around, vying for attention. But I became curious as to whether, if Obama became a Canadian citizen, he could run for PM? The answer is “yes,” because Canada has no “natural born citizen” requirement.

By the way, I’ve never thought Obama was anything but a “natural born citizen” of the US. When he was running for office, there were a lot of discussions here on the subject, so I’m not going to go into it again now. I’ll just add that the whole controversy makes me think of Macbeth – the prophecy that Macbeth couldn’t be defeated by anyone “of woman born,” and then the revelation of the fact that Macduff was “from his mother’s womb untimely ripped.”

Posted in Literature and writing, Obama | Tagged Canada | 49 Replies

YouTube ad placement

The New Neo Posted on May 9, 2026 by neoMay 9, 2026

I have the free YouTube service, and the ads are designed not only to promote whatever they’re promoting, but also to drive viewers to the point of such annoyance and frustration that they finally spring for the premium, ad-free version of YouTube.

Not me, not yet, although I find the ads incredibly annoying.

For some reason, for about a year I’ve been getting an ad for some sort of face makeup (I turn it off after the usual five seconds, so I don’t even know what it’s advertising, even after all this time), featuring a woman with the most droning grating annoying voice ever. But those ads are nowhere near as infuriating as what I’ve come to call the counter-message ads. At present, they seem to solely involve Israel and Jews – or rather, with countering the message of videos made by pro-Israel or pro-Jewish sources.

For example, if I happen to watch a video by some Jewish or Israeli organization which offers news of the Gaza War or the Iran War from Israel’s point of view, the ads invariably are pro-Gaza and pro-Hamas. If I happen to watch a video that has to do with Jewish thought or religion, invariably it is accompanied by ad after ad from proselytizing Christian organizations explicitly dedicated to converting Jews to Christianity.

These counter-ads are presently solely on Israeli or Jewish videos, but it hasn’t always been that way. I distinctly recall, during the 2024 election campaign, that nearly every pro-Trump video or podcast I would watch (or really anything on the right) would be paired with an ad for Kamala Harris. The opposite may have been true (pro-Kamala podcasts paired with Trump ads), but I wasn’t watching a whole lot of podcasts on the left, so I don’t know.

So, who makes these ad-placement decisions? It certainly doesn’t seem to be the people making the videos. Is it YouTube? Is it the advertisers? Do advertisers pay extra for counter-placement of their ads?

Posted in Finance and economics, Israel/Palestine, Jews, Politics | 20 Replies

Democrats and NeverTrumpers are very very angry at the Virginia Supreme Court

The New Neo Posted on May 9, 2026 by neoMay 9, 2026

I think they were counting on winning in court, which is one of the reasons they originally backed the idea that the court allow the vote to occur before issuing a ruling, which is an accord with Virginia precedent.

Now we get “confused” tweets like this:

very confused as to why the VA Supreme Court declined to stop the vote on the redistricting referendum. Whatever you feel about the merits of their decision to strike it down today, the handling of this is a bit odd

— Sam Stein (@samstein) May 8, 2026

Which brings up the old fools/knave issue. Does someone like this not remember the course of events? Did someone like this never pay attention in the first place? Or does he remember but is lying in order to get readers even more incensed at the court for allowing the vote to go forward and then cruelly striking down the people’s will?

Speaking of the people’s will – I’d say this is more than a “little” ironic:

Lydia Moynihan: It's a little ironic that the woman now who is likely going to win the 9th Congressional District in Tennessee is a black Republican instead of a white Democrat male. But that's racist?

Tezlyn Figaro: It actually is

It's now RACIST to elect a black Republican pic.twitter.com/2gEVkz870K

— Brianna Lyman (@briannalyman2) May 8, 2026

The only bona fide black people are Democrats.

Reaction after reaction follows a pattern that shows zero understanding of the fact that states have different rules from each other about how to accomplish redistricting, and that Virginia didn’t follow its own rules. A lot of tweets and comments follow a “they did it in [fill in the blank with a Republican-controlled state], so why can’t we do it in Virginia?” Well, because Virginia has different rules, and this is a state-by-state proposition:

The Virginia Supreme Court has narrowly voted to overturn the will of the people, who voted for a new map to counter Trump’s gerrymandering.

This is despite Republicans in the South moving to eliminate Black-majority districts without even a vote after the Supreme Court gutted… pic.twitter.com/4WoRugVIqI

— Headquarters (@HQNewsNow) May 8, 2026

Also:

Let’s be clear: If this standard applies in Virginia, it should apply in Florida too.

Two different standards for democracy is not justice. https://t.co/SsAdJupxfq

— Katherine Clark (@TeamKClark) May 8, 2026

Once again, I don’t think this is mere stupidity. The concept of federalism is not a difficult one, and I’m pretty sure these people could easily master it. Their reaction is politically motivated, of course. To me, it also indicates the desire for states all to have the same rules, and for those rules to always favor Democrats. Plus, I think these tweets come from people who may (accent on the “may”) know better, but who count on the idea that their readers don’t know better and are trying to stir them up to rage. It’s one of the reasons Democrats want education to be leftist indoctrination that keeps people ignorant of some very important facts about our government and our history.

Speaking of stirring readers to rage, we have Hasan Piker:

the va supreme court denied the results of the redistricting referendum. scotus gutted the voting rights act and tennessee carved up the last dem district destroying black voter power in the state.

those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable https://t.co/Ul1nW2oz29

— hasanabi (@hasanthehun) May 8, 2026

NOTE: And what of California? Stay tuned.

Posted in Election 2026, Law, Liberals and conservatives; left and right, Politics | 30 Replies

Open thread 5/9/2026

The New Neo Posted on May 9, 2026 by neoMay 9, 2026

Posted in Uncategorized | 16 Replies

Denaturalization

The New Neo Posted on May 8, 2026 by neoMay 8, 2026

Once a person gets US citizenship, it’s hard to lose it no matter what that person does. However, one reason it can happen is if the person committed fraud in order to obtain his or her citizenship, or committed terrorist acts or acts in support of terrorism.

And so we have this:

The DOJ is expected to announce on Friday that it is filing denaturalizing actions against 12 individuals, originally from Iraq, Colombia, Morocco, Somalia, Gambia, Bolivia, Uzbekistan, Kenya, India, China and Nigeria.

Ali Yousif Ahmed, a native of Iraq, is one of the individuals the DOJ says they are taking action against. Ahmed came to the U.S. in 2009, claiming his family was attacked by Al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq. Ten years later, Iraq asked the U.S. to extradite Ahmed to Iraq, claiming he was facing criminal charges for the premeditated murder of two Iraqi police officers in 2006.

“Upon further investigation, United States learned that, in 2015, Ahmed illegally procured his naturalization, which warrants his denaturalization, because he lied under oath about his criminal and family history when he sought admission to the United States and naturalized as a U.S. citizen,” a document on the denaturalization process and shared with the Caller read.

More at the link.

The Trump administration has been stepping up investigations for this sort of thing. Sounds like a good idea to me.
:

Posted in Immigration, Law | 10 Replies

In case you missed this: on the Carlson interview

The New Neo Posted on May 8, 2026 by neoMay 8, 2026

In the open thread the other day I posted a video by Ami Kozak satirizing Tucker Carlson . But afterward, reading the comments, I realized that unless someone’s been watching a lot of Carlson lately, there wouldn’t be much context for it. I provided some background in a comment on the thread, but most people probably didn’t see it, so I’m highlighting it here.

Carlson gave an interview to the NY Times, and it was that interview in particular that was being satirized. It was probably one of the very first times he wasn’t in the driver’s seat, either spewing out a monologue or interviewing someone hand-picked by none other than Carlson himself. As the interviewer, he can softball or hardball as he wishes, depending on how simpatico he is with the subject matter. As interviewee, he seemed flummoxed by any follow-up questions challenging him on his wild assertions, and he fell back on stark denial combined with claims of ignorance.

Here are four excerpts from the interview:

And this is the spoof video:

NOTE: For some reason, I’m having trouble finding the full NY Times interview. Is it only behind the Times’ paywall? But there are many many excerpts on YouTube.

Posted in Press | Tagged Tucker Carlson | 18 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Barry Meislin on Roundup
  • Molly Brown on Iran again – plus TDS
  • Barry Meislin on Roundup
  • Barry Meislin on Roundup
  • Barry Meislin on Roundup

Recent Posts

  • Roundup
  • The scope of Medicaid corruption: Ohio
  • Iran again – plus TDS
  • Open thread 5/11/2026
  • Happy Mother’s Day!

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (319)
  • Afghanistan (97)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (162)
  • Best of neo-neocon (90)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (583)
  • Dance (287)
  • Disaster (239)
  • Education (320)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (565)
  • Election 2018 (32)
  • Election 2020 (511)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (29)
  • Election 2028 (5)
  • Evil (127)
  • Fashion and beauty (323)
  • Finance and economics (1,020)
  • Food (316)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (729)
  • Health (1,139)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (331)
  • History (700)
  • Immigration (433)
  • Iran (440)
  • Iraq (224)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (800)
  • Jews (424)
  • Language and grammar (361)
  • Latin America (203)
  • Law (2,917)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,285)
  • Liberty (1,102)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (389)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,478)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (910)
  • Middle East (381)
  • Military (318)
  • Movies (347)
  • Music (526)
  • Nature (255)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (177)
  • Obama (1,737)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (128)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,024)
  • Poetry (255)
  • Political changers (176)
  • Politics (2,777)
  • Pop culture (393)
  • Press (1,619)
  • Race and racism (861)
  • Religion (419)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (625)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (967)
  • Theater and TV (264)
  • Therapy (69)
  • Trump (1,602)
  • Uncategorized (4,398)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,412)
  • War and Peace (994)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑