I would be extremely surprised if anything changes. Anti-discrimination law was over a period of 14 years, re-interpreted to permit and even require patronage of clients of the Anointed. We all got what Joseph Rauh wanted, not what was in the text. Also, higher education responds with try-every-door-noncompliance when they don’t get what they want, and the courts enable them, going so far as to declare initiatives ‘unconstitutional’. If you want to fix this problem, you have let the courts have it with both barrels.
“OCR’s agreement to consider an appeal is nearly unprecedented, Pekgoz told Campus Reform.
“The attorney who initially dismissed it cited a Dear Colleague Letter from 2016 which apparently allowed sex-selective scholarships ‘for the underrepresented sex,’” Pekgoz explained, saying he won the appeal by pointing out that–unlike during the 1970s when Title was put into law–women are no longer underrepresented in higher education. ” — Campus Reform
That’s the danger of loose language in legislation and its ilk.
Leave a Reply
HTML tags allowed in your
comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>
I would be extremely surprised if anything changes. Anti-discrimination law was over a period of 14 years, re-interpreted to permit and even require patronage of clients of the Anointed. We all got what Joseph Rauh wanted, not what was in the text. Also, higher education responds with try-every-door-noncompliance when they don’t get what they want, and the courts enable them, going so far as to declare initiatives ‘unconstitutional’. If you want to fix this problem, you have let the courts have it with both barrels.
“OCR’s agreement to consider an appeal is nearly unprecedented, Pekgoz told Campus Reform.
“The attorney who initially dismissed it cited a Dear Colleague Letter from 2016 which apparently allowed sex-selective scholarships ‘for the underrepresented sex,’” Pekgoz explained, saying he won the appeal by pointing out that–unlike during the 1970s when Title was put into law–women are no longer underrepresented in higher education. ” — Campus Reform
That’s the danger of loose language in legislation and its ilk.