Home » The napalm girl photograph: the myth continues

Comments

The napalm girl photograph: the myth continues — 6 Comments

  1. It never seems to end because we’re dealing with an ideological imperative. That imperative gives the lives of its acolyte’s meaning. Which is one of the most powerful of motivations.

    For such as they, the imperative is the truth and the only truth.

  2. After all, you’re talking about the US media, and we KNOW what they think, and that they have only a fleeting (at best) link to truth.

  3. Neo, I had read your previous postings here, and now I’ve also read your piece for PJM. Good job. :>)

    – – – – –

    Two articles detailing the facts of the event itself, and also of subsequent mythmaking, by Major Ron Timberlake, who was a helicopter pilot in Viet Nam and won the Silver Star.

    First, ©1999: “The Fraud Behind The Girl In The Photo: Hijacking the history of the Vietnam veteran” in 1999. Per the article, American news media reported the event accurately; the current myth of American responsibiliry was concocted and sold to the public much later, in the late 1990s. The article begins,

    Since Veterans Day of 1996, the world has been told of an American who ordered the bombing of the village of Trang Bang, Viet Nam, that resulted in the famous photo of the naked and terrified little girl running toward the Pulitzer Prize-winning photographer.

    It is a heart-wrenching photo, told since 1996 with a heart-wrenching story, but if a picture speaks a thousand words, most of the words now associated with this photo are false or misleading. It is a counterfeit commercial parable to generate maximum donations, and relies not on what actually occurred in 1972, but on dramatic fabrications that appear to have been invented specifically to enhance the impact of the Canadian produced documentary, and increase revenues for certain foundations.

    The photo is an accurate depiction of about 1/500th of a second of the immediate aftermath of an all-Vietnamese accident in an all-Vietnamese fight in June of 1972, and it was originally reported that way.

    Newly manufactured details have changed the perception and altered the reported history of that tragedy. The Canadian documentary crew and the heads of foundations that collect money for themselves created and continue a gross misrepresentation that quickly evolved into a new memory and new history of the event. It is a fraud advanced for profit, and is a lie that continues to be published as late as December of 1998.

    The Girl In The Photo was accidentally burned by her own countrymen, who were fighting her future countrymen. The only American participants of any nature were the journalists who reported the event and made her famous, and the doctors who saved her life.

    Peter Arnett, Fox Butterfield, and Christopher Wain were three who independently reported on the incident at the village of Trang Bang, when it happened in 1972. Their news reports showed it to be an accidental bombing by the Vietnamese Air Force, during an all-Vietnamese fight.

    The accident on June 8, 1972 was immediately and correctly reported by US and world news organizations.

    [Snip]

    http://www.ndqsa.com/myth.html

    .

    There is an earlier version of the article, © 1997, presented in mythbusting sections. (I find it easier to digest, but then I Am Old, Father William, and the attic contains little but dust bunnies….).

    http://www.gratitude.org/myth_of_the_girl_in_the_photo.htm

    Posted in gratitude to Major Timberlake by Linh Duy Vo, a Vietnamese refugee who came to America.

    Both are worth reading.

  4. “Ut’s image won a Pulitzer Prize in 1973 but evidence is scant that it did much to change “public attitude” – or “shift the understanding” – about Vietnam. As I noted in Getting It Wrong, U.S. public opinion had swung against the war long before the photograph was taken in 1972.” — MediaMythAlert

    “The accident on June 8, 1972 was immediately and correctly reported by US and world news organizations.” — ndqsa

    The photo shifted my understanding and attitude.
    I had no older brothers in the draft pool, and so, as a high school student up to 1970 (with all of that wisdom so celebrated today!) I was only generically against the war — having never heard anything but the Cronkite version and having no way to judge the merits of it politically — but believed in ending it by fighting to WIN it (never suspecting that we were actually doing that).

    My memories of seeing the photo are definitely from the 1972 publication: I was then in college, and mostly interested in the war ending before my friends and younger brother hit draft age, and I don’t know now if I saw the original reporting, or only the revised reports framing as it being strictly anti-American — I think it must have been the latter, and it happened very soon afterward, not as late as 1996, because I recall distinctly that this photo, plus the My Lai massacre (also not accurately reported at the time, IIRC the later revisions), turned my generic opposition into being firmly against any war that would cause our soldiers to do That Kind of Thing — I just didn’t think it was a mentally-healthy situation for the men tasked with making them happen, and I wanted our men OUT of that position.

    I was later very much against the way the Democrats dumped the South Vietnamese without any compunction, after colluding to genuinely lose the war, but that didn’t make me like napalm any better.

  5. (never suspecting that we were actually doing that).

    Just not by corrupt Johnson and his boys.

    They had to get rid of Nixon otherwise he might do even more things than ending the draft.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>