Home » The Critical Race Theory professor and the logic of the left

Comments

The Critical Race Theory professor and the logic of the left — 25 Comments

  1. Trump’s having brought the truly pernicious abomination of CRT to public attention is without question one of his finest achievements. No truly rational person could or should support it, although it is widely favored in our corrupt institutions of higher education and embedded in many departments of the government. Curiously, while one Somali immigrant (the egregious Ilhan Omar) is very upset, another far more intelligent native of the same country (Ayaan Hirsi Ali) has written on Twitter that CRT is a “racist and absolutist ideology which weaponizes grievance narratives to seize power and wealth, while preaching the dismantling and the destruction of the U.S.”

  2. McCarthy was an optimist. The Venona transcripts contain hundreds of cover names and most of those people are still unidentified.

  3. I’m really glad Trump caught on to this BS and nipped it. Since postmodernism took over academia the flood gates on leftist/marxists/craziness took over. While I suffered under this idiocracy for 15 years I never thought it would take such a strong hold in the real world. Just goes to show never underestimate the will and tirelessness of these very evil people.

  4. Re “Now as a result of the riots and the greater popularity of the anti-racism movement (another Orwellian designation) the public has been at least somewhat alerted.”

    Except that BLM is a racist anti-racist movement. And isn’t one of their goals – reportedly scrubbed from their web page last week – the elimination of the white race? Implying genocide?

  5. The left has also been screaming “McCarthy” at the right for many decades in response to any attempt on the part of the right to fight back against the left’s Gramscian march.

    Exactly. Break out of the little box where they sequester everyone who is off their ideological axis and resists keeling to their quasi-religious/ethical consensus. #PrinciplesMatter

  6. McCarthy was right. Even alcoholics can be right! He was not drunk at the time he made his accusations against the State Dept.
    Pompeo, that good man, cannot change that either. Even today it is the same, tenured members of the Executive Branch speaking out against POTUS, their boss in name only, because Civil Service rules guarantee tenure.

  7. Trump’s having brought the truly pernicious abomination of CRT to public attention is without question one of his finest achievements.

    Yes. Diversity breeds adversity. People should be wary to exercise liberal license to indulge color judgments, not limited to racism.

  8. They have good intentions.
    Very good intentions.
    In their own minds.
    Ending racism.

    They’re paving the road with their good intentions.
    The road they’re paving is the road to Hell.

    That’s what they want to turn America into.

    And there are so many of them, and oh so educated.
    Voters need to vote for, and find, Representatives who will stop funding this junk.

    And it needs to be easier to get rid of top, bad gov’t workers.
    Bad cops.
    Bad teachers.
    Bad FBI agents.
    Bad generals.

  9. The extent of infiltration into the military and federal departments is truly alarming.

    This is a ‘cancer’ and it must be excised from the body politic.

    “I’m really glad Trump caught on to this BS and nipped it.” physicsguy

    I’m not at all confident that Trump has nipped it in the bud. Yes, he’s directed the stopping of the indoctrination sessions. And will now have grounds for firing those who continue to authorize it. But that doesn’t excise CRT from the minds of those who control these agencies and commands. And, as soon as another democrat is President, the indoctrination will be renewed.

    If after his reelection, Trump doesn’t ruthlessly purge this cancer, Civil War will no longer be a case of if but of when. And, if the left steals the election, “politics by other means” will come sooner rather than later.

  10. The extent of infiltration into the military and federal departments is truly alarming.

    Not the problem that you were led to believe.

    Civil War will no longer be a case of if but of when

    As I noted in 2007, CW2 was already inevitable, because American slaves want to be slaves. Amis had 13 years to prove Ymar wrong. Still waiting.

  11. Tom Grey —

    A couple of years ago, my older, progressive cousin in California posted some meme on FB about “no matter what may have happened, my intentions were good.”

    I may have gotten through to her a little bit when I commented, “signed, Adolf Hitler”. 🙂

  12. People with the very best intentions are still deluded.
    https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-left-secretly-preps-for-violence-after-election-day?scrolla=5eb6d68b7fedc32c19ef33b4

    The Left Secretly Preps for MAGA Violence After Election Day
    The progressive coalition Fight Back Table has been meeting to game out what happens if Joe Biden doesn’t win by a landslide. It’s not pretty.
    Sam Stein
    Politics Editor
    Updated Sep. 08, 2020 11:22AM ET / Published Sep. 07, 2020 9:05PM ET

    Those involved in the conversation say this wide an array of groups has never coordinated so closely on these matters before. And the fact that they were sitting down some two months in advance of the election, was a testament to how seriously they take the complications and threats Election Day poses.

    “It is very obvious that Trump is laying the groundwork for claiming victory no matter what,” said Rahna Epting, executive director of MoveOn, and a participant in the FBT call. “Progressive groups at the end of the day believe in our democracy and, while it is not perfect, believe in building upon it and strengthening it. And we will fight to protect it from what we truly see as a president who has gone off the rails and taking this country down an authoritarian fascist path.”

    The gaming of scenarios suffers from a defect typical of the exercises, in that the parts of both sides are played by people only from one side.
    In most military war-gaming cases, they may be able to effectively “channel” the opposition, but there are always blinders and information gaps that make the games’ outcomes suspect.

    https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a19784775/gotland-class-sub-ronald-reagan-war-games/

    In 2005, the USS Ronald Reagan met its match in the form of a single, diesel-powered Swedish submarine. During war games, the plucky submarine was able to sneak through the passive sonar defenses of the Ronald Reagan and its entire accompanying group to score a few precious torpedo hits, (virtually) sinking the cruiser and getting away without so much as a scratch.

    How? As Real Engineering explains, it’s all thanks to a very old-school engine.

    USA Today had some additional information not in the Beast post, and offered some counterpoint as well.
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/08/06/election-2020-war-games-trump-vs-biden-race-show-risk-chaos/5526553002/

    The participants role-played the aftermath of four scenarios: a decisive Biden win, a narrow win for the Democratic candidate, a close electoral win for Trump but a 5-percentage point popular-vote loss, and the possibility that the outcome remains in doubt for weeks because of a deluge of mail-in ballots.

    They divided into groups – representing the Biden campaign, the Trump campaign, the media, the federal bureaucracy including military, Democratic officials and Republican officials – and forecast how they thought each might react after the election.

    Each scenario except for a Biden landslide win ended in violent protests and a constitutional crisis.

    Left-leaning circles often ponder what would happen if Trump outright refuses to leave the White House even if he is deemed the loser.

    The Transition Integrity Project predicted the military or Secret Service would escort the president out on Jan. 20 if Congress on Jan. 6 named Biden the winner and Trump refused to accept the result. But the war games never reached this point. The bigger issue, the group said in its report, is getting past Jan. 6 without a stalemate.

    “Out of this war game, we witnessed role-players exercise power nakedly,” said Retired Maj. General Paul Eaton, a military officer of 30 years and a senior advisor for Vote Vets, a progressive-aligned group that advocates for military veterans.

    He said he felt like “a naive guy” because he expected “political protocols” and “normal” behavior to regulate the outcome. “But we have seen anything but normal behaviors from the president of the United States over the last three and a half years.”

    He says that as if the Democrats have been behaving normally, despite suborning the Obama FBI & DOJ to engineer a political coup against that same president.

    Ari Fleischer, former press secretary for President George W. Bush, slammed one scenario circulated by the Transition Integrity Project – that Trump, enlisting help from the Justice Department or the postmaster general, could try to seize ballots in the mail.

    “It strikes me in the era of Trump to be one of the most irresponsible statements I’ve ever heard,” said Fleischer, who was not part of the war games. “I’m perfectly willing, and I do so often, to criticize Donald Trump, but this is pernicious. This is beyond the call. You talk about being divisive.”

    He called the suggestion that Trump might not accept election results “dangerous.”

    “Where’s the evidence that this is what Trump is going to do according to his accusers? If the results are clear, the results are clear,” Fleischer said.

    Fleischer said not accepting results is different than not conceding in the event of an extremely close race, such as the 2000 when Bush defeated Democrat Al Gore. The biggest risk facing the 2020 election, he said, is not Trump rejecting an outcome – but that the race boils down to absentee ballots in a handful of states not accustomed to mail-voting on a large scale.

    Brooks acknowledged the simulations were “totally artificial in a million ways.” For starters, she said it’s possible the players, by taking part in a game with no stakes, may have pushed limits further than would happen in reality. But she said it was the best they could do to simulate actual circumstances under real time.

    “More likely than not,” she said the U.S. will have a “more or less normal election” in November with the loser conceding.

    But Brooks said: “Events are likely to unfold really fast after Election Day. Those who have thought through what can be done and what the legal options are, and so on, are in a much better position than those who think, ‘Oh that probably won’t come up.'”

  13. Critical race theory is, like all Post Modern BS, difficult to comprehend because it assumes that life should be fair. If only they can get rid of the oppressors, or bring them low, all will be well. What they fail to see is that they will only replace their old oppressors (those who believed in free speech, free association, and private property backed by laws) with new oppressors who despise free speech, free association, and private property. They apparently don’t see the eventual consequences of their actions. Or maybe they think it will be their foot in the boot stomping others in the face. Whatever, it is hard for those who have always known life wasn’t fair, and that the only thing to do was to pay the cards dealt you as best as you can, to go along with their line of reasoning.

    Gun and ammo sales are booming. I think I know why.

  14. “The Left Secretly Preps for MAGA Violence After Election Day
    The progressive coalition Fight Back Table has been meeting to game out what happens if Joe Biden doesn’t win by a landslide.”

    I find it revealing that the progressive coalition didn’t game out the most likely scenario; Trump winning by an electoral landslide.

    I suspect that may have been intentional, given how obvious a scenario that is, perhaps they just couldn’t face it. Or as likely, they didn’t want to publicly admit to the predictable reaction by their radicals to that eventuality, even greater and more widespread violence.

  15. “…very best intentions…”

    Yes, a severe problem.

    In this case, though, since the 2016 elections, Democratic Party, MSCM and Leftist delusion / paranoia / insanity / hysteria—and its resultant projection—has gone through the roof…and is currently in the stratosphere.

    And it will get worse—since the Democrats et al. firmly believe that the Republicans will do to them what the Democrats (et al.) have been doing to the Republicans over the past four years (and more), which they intend to continue do to the Republicans—and all Americans who disagree with them—in the days, weeks and months (and years) ahead.

    In other words, Hillary Clinton’s loss in 2016 (a loss in large part due to the fact that she was absolutely convinced she would win—otherwise, she would have been sure to cheat more than she did) “justifies” Democratic Party “self-defense” or, if you will, “pre-emption”.

    So that “the logic of the left” is in essence, “the paranoia of the left”.

    At the end of the day, it’s all they have really. That and a tremendous libido for destruction (of the individual, of property, of society, and of the nation).

    “Biden-Harris” indeed!

  16. Should add that it’s a paranoia and violence that has been reconfigured, recalibrated, reworked—REDEFINED—as the epitome of morality, the cutting edge of legality…and absolutely necessary to “save the country”.

    But then—as is the whole point of the post—this is precisely why (as Hitchens put it) “Orwell still matters”. (Not that this was ever in doubt; on the other hand, Orwell can, along with everything else, be intentionally misinterpreted and perverted by those with skill, talent—and “PASSIONATE INTENSITY”.)

    File under: Even the devil can quote Orwell.

  17. My train of thought at the moment (subject to change, of course, with added data). A number of you have already figured this out, of course, so I’m just repeating, but bear with me, I’m slow:

    1. The MSM could have spiked this as being too radioactive for public consumption and did not. Therefore they want this material to circulate.
    2. It follows from point 1 that the powers that be, or a significant faction among them, desire that such a crisis as described occur.
    3. It further follows that said powers are confident that they can come out on the far side of said crisis as the winners.
    4. Those of us on the other side have less than two months to discover and, to the extent possible, nullify the reasons for that confidence.

    At this point, I’m looking for what the action items are. What do I need to have on my personal to-do list to make this work?

  18. Like ‘je’ your first commenter, I am very happily surprised that Critical Race Theory and the like is being directly spoken about by President Trump. Awareness of it and closely connected intellectual movements have gained dominant cultural power in the US since the 80s. The president calling it out from Mt Rushmore in the public square is truly amazing after watching grow like a cancer for the past 40 years. Spengler began overtly worrying about “The Decline of the West” 98 years ago, and to anyone sensitive to said decline the ‘disturbance in the force’ that ran through the West in 2016 can see that things are really accelerating. Particularly since the woo woo floo and the neo Marxist riots. It seems to me, that since the abandonment of traditional and legal means of opposition to a duly elected president, the Democrats (and the Never Trumpers more passively) have been unconsciously doing stuff more likely to discredit and destroy themselves than Western Civilisation. I’m not predicting it but they are doing one brilliant job of creating a Trump landslide and perhaps destroying the Democratic party. That result might be the best outcome for the left – there are plenty of decent liberals and a new party that is not corrupt and not Marxist could get a fresh start. That’s way too optimistic, but it seems possible – so, heck, let it ride.

  19. “…destroying the Democratic party.”

    I was always of the mind that that was precisely what Obama did.

    (Well, he had to start somewhere….)

  20. Neo, you have made me so happy today by writing “Trump could NOT care less” instead of “Trump could care less.” A victory for the meaning of words.

  21. McCarthy was an optimist. The Venona transcripts contain hundreds of cover names and most of those people are still unidentified.

    Another frame job by em-pathetic leftists to influence and steer social development. Nazi, [rabid] diversitist, pro-life, are two more boxes they like to sequester people in.

  22. J.J. on September 10, 2020 at 12:22 am said:
    Critical race theory is, like all Post Modern BS, difficult to comprehend because it assumes that life should be fair. If only they can get rid of the oppressors, or bring them low, all will be well. What they fail to see is that they will only replace their old oppressors (those who believed in free speech, free association, and private property backed by laws) with new oppressors who despise free speech, free association, and private property. They apparently don’t see the eventual consequences of their actions.
    * * *

    I blame it all on John Rawls.
    https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2018/07/27/john-rawls-a-theory-of-justice/

    A successful theory of justice must explain why clear injustices are unjust and help us resolve current disputes. John Rawls (1921-2002) was a Harvard philosopher best known for his A Theory of Justice (1971), which attempted to define a just society. Nearly every contemporary scholarly discussion of justice references A Theory of Justice. This essay reviews its main themes.

    A collective agreement on the basic structure of society is an attractive ideal. But some people are more powerful than others: some may be wealthier, or part of a social majority. If people can dominate negotiations because of qualities that are, as Rawls (72-75) puts it, morally arbitrary, that is wrong. People don’t earn these advantages: they get them by luck. For anyone to use these unearned advantages to their own benefit is unfair, and the source of many injustices.

    [Ergo, “white privilege.”]

    This inspires Rawls’ central claim that we should conceive of justice ‘as fairness.’ To identify fairness, Rawls (120) develops two important concepts: the original position and the veil of ignorance:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>