Home » SCOTUS rules for the continuance of DACA

Comments

SCOTUS rules for the continuance of DACA — 19 Comments

  1. It is said by persons with knowledge of Roberts that he is a believer in a ruling elite. he does not like to upset them.

  2. The way Roberts bent over backwards to uphold Obamacare removes any possible doubt about what’s really going on here.

    I pair this ridiculous ruling with Rich Lowry’s newest column in Politico where he warns conservatives not to defend Confederate statues.

    https://twitter.com/RichLowry/status/1273622011051376641?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

    Robert and Lowry comfortably represent the Republican establishment in the U.S. and neither one seems to understand that without religious and cultural conservatives, their political party would have a tough time winning anything higher than a city council seat. If Trump goes down this November, it will be time to enlighten them on that salient fact.

    Mike

    Mike

  3. In three recent decisions, two of which Roberts wrote, he:

    1) Religious liberty is subject to being disregarded if an emergency is declared.

    2) Words in the constitution and laws can be reinterpreted at anytime and new law created at the court’s discretion.

    3) An Executive Order, when even the executive said he didn’t have the authority to rewrite the law, is the law which must only be overturned with greater diligence than what went into its creation.

    The US has been transformed into a banana republic where the elites can, and will, do whatever they want and the courts concur or take it further to deny all of us rights and equality under the law.

    Favored groups will gain power and the elites will continue their lording over us.

  4. Welcome to a time of sanctioned lawlessness and the arbitrary exercise of power. Question, is this ruling extraordinary, without precedence?

  5. Can someone please tell me why we voted for 12 years of Bushes?
    What did we get from that family tree that expanded individual liberty, reduced the size of government & its interference in our lives, or rolled back the globalist onslaught?

    I’ve about had all I can stand of the “Well…the other guys would have been worse.” Dukakis, Gore & Kerry could well have been unmitigated disasters. How is Roberts not? How was Iraq II not? The list is long and we could all add our “favorite” neoconservative cluster….

    Yep…the last week of a so-called “conservative” SCOTUS rulings, riots in the streets over nothing & a months-long quarantine for no discernible result pretty much has me reaching for the pitchforks & torches.

  6. What one pen and phone can enact, another pen and phone should be able to cancel. That systems have twisted themselves into purpose should not be taken into account when they will untwist themselves after the cancellation.

  7. I have always been concerned that the deep state has something on Roberts. What it is is unknown,yes .. Sex??family??…It will only come out if he does not rule the right way…

  8. Lost in the discussion is the obvious attack on representative democracy. If a President makes a executive order that the mob likes, it becomes law. If the public dislikes it, we can vote for a different President, but, apparently, he doesn’t have the power to rescind the decree. Perhaps the SCOTUS will allow the law to be changed by a bill passed by both houses of Congress, but that’s a tall order, given the ability to filibuster. The public elected this President to reverse policies on immigration, but they won’t get it.

    Apparently, we don’t elect Presidents anymore: we elect kings, but DNC kings are more equal than GOP kings.

  9. Mark Levin is telling radio listeners that SCOTUS is now lawless, and Roberts is almost completely gone to the old left. They are a fascist body, today, he argues.

    SCOTUS now does more to trash law and damage the Republic than mass rioters and looters do.

    Even Traitor Obama knew DACA was not Constitutional. Levin plays sound bites via PJmedia of Zero admitting so (I assume they have this theme covered there, today). Then he plays two bites of Sen Cruz on the floor of Senate excoriating this trashing.

    Not even The Court denies that Obama believed DACA was unconstitutional.

    “This decision was fascistic,” says Levin. It Denies the rule of law and denies the separation of powers. Say it, Brother!

    The Court, “It’s destroying its reputation to the American people,” says Levin. Indeed. No respect for any lying Courts or lawyers. Only hatred.

    It’s dead to me.

    Roberts must be impeached. If only for the Right who don’t join the New Civil War. Conservatives MUST organise the right to indict him. Elect only Senators to campaign for this single issue. Every election.

    I trust this Mark Levin show will be posted online somewhere. (I missed the first 6 minutes.)

  10. Parker asks, “ Welcome to a time of sanctioned lawlessness and the arbitrary exercise of power. Question, is this ruling extraordinary, without precedence?” No, not technically.

    Gorsuch and Roberts have sent a few other decisions back to the Executive branch for procedural redressing.

    But in terms of border control and immigration policy, yes, I believe this one is a first ever. Advert to illegals! Open Borders USA, c’mon down!

    Equally, the open partisanship of Team Roberts is revealed by swallowing whole the best anti-Trump, anti-sovereignty rationale on offer. The embrace IS Trump Hate agenda driven.

    Thus, there are a web of multiple messages in this decision. Discard the dressing, however, and it’s usurpation of the People’s law making powers. They hate us. We must return the favour and return the hate.

    Time to plan your exit from the US or else stock your remote bolt hole.

  11. Ah, but Robert’s will always rule “the right way”. He knows who butters his bread.

  12. “Conservatives MUST organise the right to indict him.” TJ

    News flash! Constitutional conservatives are decidedly in the minority… on the right.

    Proof of that assessment is the failure of the Tea Party to gain dominance on the right.

    That’s human nature; historically demonstrated by the fact that only about 1/3rd of the american colonists were actually willing to fight the British. 1/3 were loyalists and the last 1/3rd sitting on the sidelines waiting to see who the winner would turn out to be… today we call them RINOs and Liberals.

  13. Geoffrey – looks like the breakdown into thirds is pretty ancient.
    (Even if you don’t accept the theology, the math seems to keep cropping up.)

    https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bd/war-in-heaven?lang=eng

    War in Heaven
    This term arises out of Rev. 12:7 and refers to the conflict that took place in the premortal existence among the spirit children of God. The war was primarily over how and in what manner the plan of salvation would be administered to the forthcoming human family upon the earth. The issues involved such things as agency, how to gain salvation, and who should be the Redeemer. The war broke out because one-third of the spirits refused to accept the appointment of Jesus Christ as the Savior. Such a refusal was a rebellion against the Father’s plan of redemption. It was evident that if given agency, some persons would fall short of complete salvation; Lucifer and his followers wanted salvation to come automatically to all who passed through mortality, without regard to individual preference, agency, or voluntary dedication (see Isa. 14:12–20; Luke 10:18; Rev. 12:4–13; D&C 29:36–38; Moses 4:1–4). The spirits who thus rebelled and persisted were thrust out of heaven and cast down to the earth without mortal bodies, “and thus came the devil and his angels” (D&C 29:37; see also Rev. 12:9; Abr. 3:24–28).

    The warfare is continued in mortality in the conflict between right and wrong, between the gospel and false principles, etc. The same contestants and the same issues are doing battle, and the same salvation is at stake.

    Although one-third of the spirits became devils, the remaining two-thirds were not all equally valiant, there being every degree of devotion to Christ and the Father among them. The most diligent were chosen to be rulers in the kingdom (Abr. 3:22–23). The nature of the conflict, however, is such that there could be no neutrals, then or now (Matt. 12:30; 1 Ne. 14:10; Alma 5:38–40).

  14. There is no named political party for the actually conservative 1/3 of the people.

    https://babylonbee.com/news/having-been-betrayed-by-republican-judges-conservatives-vow-to-vote-republican-even-harder-next-time

    I can see the reasoning by the Bee writer, but there really doesn’t seem to be an alternative to continuing to vote Republican — it’s guaranteed that Democrat-appointed justices would be even worse than Roberts (and Gorsuch, apparently).

  15. When speaking of Roberts recall:
    1) the banned immigration question on the census
    2) “no Obama judges”
    3) Roberts oversaw the FISA court

  16. What we’ve recently witnessed is the strongest possible evidence that SCOTUS judges should not be appointed for life. We need an Amendment that limits each to a ten-year term, rotates the Chief judgeship every 2 or 4 years by vote of the judges, and further service on the Court is subject to re-confirmation by the Senate.

    No more Warrens or Roberts!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>