Home » Jonathan Haidt on the extreme importance of opinion diversity to challenge motivated reasoning

Comments

Jonathan Haidt on the extreme importance of opinion diversity to challenge motivated reasoning — 15 Comments

  1. Why are they psychologists? Where are the Constitutional scholars, the historians, the clergy, the military, the common (forgotten) man? Obama not being one of any of these, of course.

    This is about liberty, free speech, basic human rights granted by God under Natural Law, and we get two psychologists?

    That they are speaking up “courageously” is fine, but where are the voices that should matter? Why is courage required? To go against the mob of liberal fascists is why.

  2. Frog:

    People like Dershowitz are also doing it, but in the law arena.

    In academia, I’m not sure why it’s psychologists.

  3. Wow! I’ll bet or at least hope that Heterodox Academy has an impact. My alma mater Brown made the bottom of the list. Well deserved!

    I recall enjoying the campus life with my friends who were studying physics, math, applied math, econ, pre-med, psych, and engineering. We universally treated those SJW people we bumped into like they had two heads. Walk the other way.

    Haidt mentions the donor alums as a silver bullet of sorts. But there are many aspects that matter. Faculty selection and the tenure process matter. Parents that pay tuition should be aware.

    Parents and students are motivated by academic prestige which can impact job opportunities. Prestige attracts the best students and having the best students increases prestige. Maybe that can be affected, but changing that is likely difficult and slow.

    The really pernicious angle is the DOJ (& DOE??) forcing this stuff on universities.

  4. Very encouraging.

    Trump can stop the DOJ & DOE arm twisting. In fact, it’s my understanding that he has already begun to do so.

    Frog,
    Half of the American public does not believe in God given rights, much less in natural law.

  5. I joined HxA about 7 months ago and have found a pleasing collection of conservatives and classic liberals. The real problem HxA is grappling with at present is how to affect the change we all see as needed. Changing such an imbedded culture as exists in the academy is very difficult. Like the massive cargo ship where the rudder is moved and two miles later the ship begins to change its heading.

  6. As far as Haidt being a psychologist, I believe his area is evolutionary psych, which automatically puts him at odds with the SJW majority of psychologists. For Peterson , I think it’s just his high level of personal integrity.

  7. After Trump won the election, Haidt’s wife, Jayne Riew, also did a pretty brave thing — she created the “She’s With Him” photo essay (https://www.sheswithhim.com/About):

    In the days after the election, people around me struggled to make sense of what had happened. Perhaps the biggest surprise was the female vote. Among women who cast ballots, 42% were with him, not with her. Most of the women and mothers I knew were shocked or angry that other women and mothers could choose Trump over Clinton.

    I was very apprehensive about a President Trump. But I was repelled by the ugly stereotypes and facile theories about his supporters. In the subway and coffee shops of lower Manhattan I overheard people trying to picture the Americans who had handed Trump the election: “people who haven’t seen the world,” “no one with a daughter,” “resentful of our success,” “unskilled and no-tech,” “old and behind the times,” “duped,” “white people who are afraid,” and all the usual —ists.

    In many parts of America, female Trump supporters knew they had to keep their voting intentions hidden, not just from pollsters, but from people close to them. That intrigued me. What else did they have to say?

    To reach 42%, Trump had to have drawn in women who didn’t fit the stereotype. I set out to find some. Asking friends of friends, I identified dozens of women and reached out to them. Most said no. A few felt they could take part in a photo essay only if I hid their faces and identities. Others backed out when they learned that I had voted for Clinton. But seven generous women gave me their trust as well as their insights and personal stories.

    I’m not a political thinker. I’m an artist and photographer, and all day long I think about making stuff. But I also like to learn people’s stories and tell them. In this project I have used portrait photography to present seven women who acted contrary to stereotypes and social pressures. I have tried to convey their character, optimism, strength and vulnerability. Thanks for visiting She’s With Him.

    The women who took part included one who graduated from Yale in 2016, a restaurant owner, a financial analyst, a university professor, a hedge fund VP, a small business owner, and a graphic designer. Really interesting to read what they had to say.

  8. I have five children, from age 53 to 28. There are leftists and two are conservative. The one son who is conservative owns his own house and does not have a college degree.

    He is the only one of my kids to not have a bachelors and the only one to own nice home.

    Your site is acting like Chicagoboyz and not saving ID. Are you using also using WordPress?

  9. Haidt is doing great work.
    Having a ranking is a great way to tell the public, and the schools, how bad they are and who is the worst.

    I think calling them Bullies instead of Warriors would be more accurate.

    Psychology is looking to be more of a science — using data gathered from experiments. With experiments roughly repeatable (or exactly). To find out more about the Truth of how humans are.

    The Social Justice Bullies believe in many things that are not true. Anybody looking more for truth finds out that the PC believers support policies based on their false beliefs.

    Neo, your title should use ” extreme importance”, not “important”.

    http://www.neoneocon.com/2018/05/25/jonathan-haidt-on-the-extreme-important-of-opinion-diversity-to-challenge-motivated-reasoning/

  10. At work I mentioned Jordan Peterson to a 20 year old that has discovered me as a common sense, free market, whatever people like us should call ourselves these days.

    HE LIT UP! I mean he became so animated and talked about how important he was.

    I didn’t expect this because I thought Jordan was somebody that spoke to our generation (I am very close to 50).

    I see so many now who called themselves liberal (Weinstein, Dave Rubin, etc) who are helping everyone understand the difference between truth and enlightenment and science versus post modernism and Marxism and what is that thing called – oh yeah – intersectionality…. it hurt to type the word.

    Anyways, my coworker saw the Munk debates and thought Michael Eric Dyson ensured a loss basically by taking the tactic he took of calling Jordan Peterson a meean white man. It only served to help him lose the debate.

  11. I’ve been thinking about Neo’s closing comment, and there may be great significance to the fact that we have two psych profs. taking a stand. (A very small data set, of course.) I caught a brief Peterson interview some weeks ago, and he said that it all began for him, when he decided that he wasn’t going to tell himself or others lies anymore. (I hope that is roughly accurate.)

    Motivated by my basic history discovery that Pres. McKinley was assassinated by an anarchist, I did a fairly deep internet dive on the anarcho-syndicalist movement, in 2005 or so. Most of that material is gone now, but I came away with the feeling that the underlying tenets of the movement was just a huge confidence scam.

    What is the connection between modern politics (maybe ancient too) and deception. Deceiving others and oneself? Who better to understand than a psych professional?

  12. This is a noble effort but my observation is that once the Left takes over an institution they will destroy it before they allow anyone else to take over. Examples abound:

    Newspapers have seen their business shrink but make no effort to reach out to the their potential conservative readers.

    Television networks allow their late night “comics” to preach to their audience and literally tell conservatives who do not like it to take a hike.

    Science fiction’s Hugo awards committee got their leftist members to vote no award when hugely popular non-SJW books were nominated (see the Sad Puppies affair).

    The Boy Scouts have destroyed their hundred year old institution by first allowing openly homosexual men to be scout masters and now allowing girls to join.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>