Home » Obama nominates Merrick Garland to SCOTUS

Comments

Obama nominates Merrick Garland to SCOTUS — 36 Comments

  1. If Congressional Republicans support Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, then everyone will assume that the GOP leadership thinks that neither Trump nor Cruz can defeat Hillary. Even a tacit public admission would be an impossible position.

    Worse yet, many of Trump’s supporters believe absolutely in his upcoming victory. They would interpret GOP support of Obama’s nominee as a perfidious effort to block Trump’s righteous authority.

    Even if the GOP leadership has hired the world’s best fortune teller, who’s told them that Hillary will win and will nominate a Communist to the Court, the GOP is cornered by circumstances. They can do nothing but oppose Obama’s nominee.

  2. I think they should stick to their guns. If they can’t, someone should full on Bork the guy and give dems a taste of their own medicine. They could do it on his 2nd amendment decisions alone.

  3. Absent Obama’s appointing a judge that agrees with Scalia’s thinking, JUST SAY NO.

  4. A simple majority vote is required to confirm or to reject a nominee, but a successful filibuster threat could add the requirement of a supermajority of 60 needed in favor of cloture, which would allow debate to end and force a final vote on confirmation.
    So as Reid did, change the dang rules to benefit the GOP this time. Make cloture a simple majority. But as most Republicans feel, the GOP is gutless.

  5. If McConnell keeps his powder dry and sticks to his promise, Trump has a great opportunity to come out in support. He has said he’d appoint someone as close to Scalia as he could find.

  6. May i add that what makes Cornflour analysis so excellent is his consideration of time and how the remembered past would affect the future, even if another answer would have been the “right” one as viewed in some distant hindsight. Hindsight is not 20/20 anymore.

  7. This is actually a good opportunity: the very next time President Obama says the Senate should do their job, they should reply, “Do your job, and have the Justice Department indict Hillary Clinton for her criminal wrong-doing with her private e-mail server. Do your job, Mr. Obama.”

  8. Moderate? Garland is a flaming liberal gun grabber. As an appeals court judge, he voted (in 2007) to reverse a D.C. Circuit Court decision that struck down Washington’s handgun ban as unconstitutional.

  9. Don’t care. No need for explanations, Obama gets no nominees…because elections have consequences.

  10. Only one nominee Obama could make whom I would call on the Senate to consider: Ted Cruz. That would be a devious but clever move by Obama, as the Senate would be glad to consider him and it would clear the field for a Trump nomination, whom Hillary would beat. I think Obama missed his best choice.

  11. Don’t settle for anyone if they aren’t an Originalist like Scalia. That’s the order – server it as ordered.

  12. Speaking of Hillary, besides the dilemma above there is another interesting dilemma for the FBI. they are talking about indicting Hillary on violations of the Espionage act. its an interesting pickle

    to be an honest fbi (given the most serious evidence), they would have to charge her, but if they charge her, people will think the fbi dishonest in fixing the election

    however, if they try to avoid that end, they would have to be dishonest and not charge her, to which another side will think they are fixing the election by not charging and taking her as is proper (and so deny the title to who remains)

    actually given the outcome its mortons fork, not a dilemma, in either case the FBI will appear to be fixing the election.

    veddy interesting…

  13. Great comment Yankee.

    But the elephant in the room must not be acknowledged.

    If the media did its constitutional duty the only thing she would have been questioned on in those fake debates was her private server. Twenty hard questions; not one softball.

    On another blog a Lib asserted to me that this email thing is just a bureaucratic screwup. No lie. The Chinese and Russians are laughing at us.

  14. If the GOP was smart it would start a “do your job” meme on Obama.

    Do your job and stop illegal immigration.

    Protect our secrets.

    Destroy ISIS.

    Fix the VA. Etc.

  15. The details are irrelevant.

    No leftist, moderate or not is a fit replacement for an historic conservative Justice who changed everyone’s perspective on the Constitution and its interpretation.

    #NeverGarland

  16. It was a smart move by Obama, which is why it is surprising. The Republicans will slow walk the nomination and wait to see if they have a chance to win in November.

    A filibuster will not be needed by the Democrats if the Republicans lose in November and then try to approve Garland in the lame duck session- Obama will simply withdraw the nomination and put up his real choice, or let the new President Clinton do so. If Republicans are going to take “lesser of two evils” approach, they will would have to approve Garland before November, but after they are convinced they are going to lose. I think the smartest move of all is to simply wait it out. Like Neo, I think Garland will eventually prove to be a total lock on the liberal side- I don’t really believe him to be a moderate at all, so there isn’t all that much to lose by denying him confirmation or even a hearing.

  17. Only the Left considers him ‘moderate.’

    Remember that Al Franken and Barry Soetoro both think that they are centrists, hence moderates.

    Franken even stated so in his book.

  18. A change story!!
    a last minute change story!!!
    [for insight, not persuasion]

    Why I Voted For Trump… a last minute decision…

    I live in Missouri, the state Trump won by less than 2,000 (the last I heard). I had been saying all along that I’d be voting for Ted Cruz, mainly because he says he’s a Christian. But on the day of our election this week, I could not do it, I voted for Trump… knowing full well his foibles. Here’s the short story of my transformation:

    I am a Christian man in my sixties, have not always been the best I could be, either as a man or a Christian, but I do try, sometimes. Months and even years back I saw Cruz as one of the only ones in DC who was standing for what I believe; I thought then, if he runs for POTUS, he’s got my vote. However, the more I’ve heard him speak, the less I’ve liked him, not because of the content of what he says, he says mostly the right things, but its the way in which he says them… inauthentic, insincere, disingenuous; these are words that describe my emotions when I see the expression on his face when he speaks, and then there’s that stupid little half-smile after he says a one line-er to applause… ick!

    Right up until the day of the election, Tuesday, I had never really understood how instrumental Cruz was in giving us John Roberts, Chief Justice of the supreme court (the man that literally delivered Obamacare to the nation as law). The day of our election, I looked up an article from a Texas news/paper/mag, that railed on Cruz because he was one of the biggest voices selling John Roberts to the nation. Unfortunately for Cruz, I read that article before voting on Tuesday… that is mostly what sealed the deal, against voting for him.

    Cruz may be a moral man, but the devil used him to help sink our nation to where we are today; moral maybe, but not wise.

    Why the hell would I want that man in the White House.

    Comparatively, Trump is not what I’d call a moral man, at least by biblical standards, but we know that about him, its a given… he’s not trying to gloss over his, well, fallenness; he is what he is… I dumped Cruz for Trump. I made that decision within about two hours before I voted.

    It’s not easy to explain but I felt a sense of freedom when I voted for Trump. My brother who is a Baptist pastor was nearly apoplectic when I told him I voted for Trump, he wanted me to feel very,very guilty, but I don’t, I actually feel quite good about it.

    Adding to that, there is the “inbetween-the-lines” reasons that swung me to Trump. The biggest? All the entities that we conservatives and Christians see as our mortal opposition, the MSM, DC Elite, Republican Establishment, Liberal Progressives, Black Lives Matter, and now, Fox News have been trying to destroy Trump… “the enemy (Trump) of my enemy (the above noted) is my friend”.

    I know their hatred of me and all that I hold dear, so when I see them descend on Trump with the same ferocity that I know they hold toward me and my kind, I count Trump as my kind. And now out of desperation, Ted Cruz seems to be siding with the enemy, not my kind… phooey on that!

    Trump is not claiming Messiahship, like Obama does, and like Ted seems to imply (the savior of Conservatism), Trump is Trump!

    And you know what, I like that… as brash and unsavory as he may seem, compared to the PC Elites, Trump is more like me than anything I have seen!

    It felt good to vote for Trump…

    I feel like a feminist freed from her bra strap, free at last, free at last…

  19. Trump is very very likely to win AZ next week. How much longer is Cruz going to drag this on?

    The last poll out of Arizona from March 10 (MBQF):
    Trump 37%
    Cruz 23%
    Kasich 15%

    Trump also had a larger lead of 41%-24% among early voters

  20. K-E:

    Citing that poll in order to suggest Cruz should drop out soon is so fascinating of you. First of all, no helpful link. Why not? But even without a link, I would hope people can do math. Those numbers add up to 75%. Where is the missing mass, as it were?

    Rubio voters, and undecideds. Here’s a link.

    Now, there’s no question that Trump could win Arizona, and win it all. But there’s also no question that Cruz shouldn’t drop out, because it remains to be seen how he’d do with Rubio gone and he could do quite well. And citing incomplete statistics from polls won’t fly here.

    Why do you feel the need to urge that Cruz should drop out, or at least to imply it? I believe you mean well and are acting in good faith here (and in good faith in your support of Trump, too), but that just doesn’t make sense.

  21. Fred:

    I have removed your completely off-topic comments. Quit spamming the threads.

  22. Artfl, once again you are positive in your opinions but wrong on your facts. The FBI does not indict anybody. The FBI makes a criminal referral to the Justice Department. The Justice Department, i.e., Loretta Lynch, determines whether to convene a grand jury to indict.
    A grand jury may have been convened; it is unusual, but not unheard of, for immunity to be granted without one, but that doesn’t mean DOJ will have the grand jury indict.

    It all comes down to politics. If Trump gets the nomination, the Evil Empress will be indicted. If the FBI Director tells Lynch that he and dozens, perhaps hundreds, of agents will resign, the Evil Empress will be indicted. If Lynch and the Onederboy succeed in cowing Comey and the rest of the FBI and IC into silence, she won’t be indicted.

    Get it?

  23. Artful, honestly. If Trump were to get elected, which is dubious (chances are, he’s only here because he’s the only person that could possibly have gotten involved in the race that his friend Hillary could beat) at best he is going to be a one-term failure that will embarrass actual Republicans (if our party still exists) for years.

    He shows no real ability to do anything other than rabble-rouse crowds at the lowest-common-denominator level. His ideas are puerile and delivered as if by a man who really has no idea whatsoever what he’s doing here. I disrespect him as a human for his repeated displays of boorish, aggressive and patently offensive behavior and as I noted on a different forum, given that his specialty seems to be making a small fortune from a large one, I don’t greatly respect him as anything other than a self-hyped and overhyped brand when it comes to business.

    Your attempts to attack Trump’s opposition by any tinfoil hat thing you can find make you sound like a democrat troll and had I not seen you here for years, that’s what I would assume you are. Here, I can only presume that not only have you drunk the Trump Koolaid, you’ve invested your life savings in it.

    I used to do a lot of debating in a certain sports field, and the Trump backers remind me of the subset of the population which obsesses on newcomers and dismisses those with any sort of real established record, even if it’s good. They’re not looking for good, they’re looking for an Epic Hero; and once something is demonstrated to be merely good, it can never be an Epic Hero. But anyone with no record at all still could be The One.

    News flash: Trump is not The One, anymore than Obama was.

  24. Garland a moderate? A moderate! “Thou are neither hot nor cold… And I will spew thee out of my mouth.” Garland well knows the lay of the land at this time and he is a committed-enough Leftist to allow Obama to cynically use him as a political toy boy in hopes of baiting the Republicans. What more need be said.

  25. From yesterday’s WSJ on Judge Garland:
    “law professor Clare Huntington, who clerked for Judge Garland during his first year on the D.C. Circuit, described him as “deeply involved in the minutiae” of legal reasoning, sweating the details of each case rather than promoting a broader philosophical agenda. In addition to criminal law, Judge Garland has a special expertise in administrative law–“the bread and butter of the D.C. Circuit,” which handles many cases involving federal agencies, Ms. Huntington said.”

    In other words, Garland pursues trivia; he is a judicial mouse, the 180 degree opposite of Scalia. As an expert in administrative law, he manifestly likes to deal with Federal bureaucrats and their bureaucracies.

    Garland is a sweaty wee little man, exactly the kind of guy to take orders from Great Leaders like BHO and Hillary.

    He is also very opposed to the 2nd Amendment.

    The notion that his nomination should be kept open until after the election, so that he could be Senate-confirmed before Hillary takes office to nominate someone worse is a quite nutty idea. If Hillary wins and Dems retake the Senate, BHO just withdraws Garland’s nomination in November, in order for fire to rain down from Democratic heaven come 2017.

  26. Kyndyll G’s analysis above of Donald Trump is spot on.

    Trump is a shameless self-promoter that lacks any substance and covers it will bullying bluster. He appears to be a pathetic person who know the price of everything and the value of nothing, especially our Constitution.

    Garland would certainly be the fifth certain vote on the liberal side of the Supreme Court and the GOP should make that clear to the public without entertaining any hearings.

  27. Artfldgr:

    I think you are wrong about Justice Roberts and Cruz.

    That is, Justice Roberts WAS a good appointment at the time. But, something happened to him between his first draft of the first SCOTUS opinion in the 2012 case NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS ET AL. v. SEBELIUS and his final draft.

    See,
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2012/07/01/the-supreme-courts-john-roberts-changed-his-obamacare-vote-in-may/#5c31bfc27c4c

    I don’t know what it was, but I suspect it was not something good.

    Whatever it was, it was not something that Cruz or most other people could anticipate.

  28. Trump will be no worse than Arnold in CA – blustering and egotistical, Arnauld was a faux republican who created years of deadlock, which is the best that can happen, especially compared to Hillary.

    Those who say Trump will result in anything but gridlock are just tin hat lunatics. His executive orders won’t increase immigration, and his staff will include Christie, Carson and other “real” republicans so the rank and file will swing things right at least the lower level.

    Those who are “never trump” are as much enemies as the left since they don’t know how government operates.

  29. neo-neocon

    I did not in any way prosperously tried or trying spamming your post.

    My apologies, however its your space and you’r free to do what you like.
    thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>