Home » Counting terrorist attacks: what does the FBI say?

Comments

Counting terrorist attacks: what does the FBI say? — 18 Comments

  1. The pro-choice cult deserves a category of its own. It is competitive with “secular” left-wing regimes and their universal Islamic counterparts.

  2. Once we had a state that was more soviet than representative, we have people gaming the reports by lots of various means, many of them subtle and cumulative over time. take nidal hassan, thats not terrorism, thats work place violence. Same would be true of Alton Nolen, who they dressed up the whole thing as to being upset for being fired, and ignore he cut the womans head off, was muslim, the tradition of head cutting, and that the mosque he belonged to was not one of the nicer ones.

    neither of these would be on the list of terrorist attacks, and if you DO go before 1980, you would have to include the middle east plane hijackings and the names of the organizations and such that went with that. so like the lynching numbers stopping at the point where they would have to record hayes tilden democrat driven mass murder, they conveniently pick the date (As neo points out)

    so its a wash… even more so when these erroneous numbers are then presented in averages that leave out the numbers used to derive them… which then people apply those averages to numbers they look up that may or may not have been used or may or may not have been corrected in some way also not defined.

    for the most part useless…
    and purposefully so… like money supply and unemployment figures…like the factory reports to each soviet as to its production…

  3. n.n, if you can translate economic marxism into cultural marxism, why cant you transfer war concept to things like demographic war, in which you manipulate democidal policies by taking advantage of a group and then protecting that manipulation by telling the group they are really smart for doing it and so, they would rather go over a cliff like thelma and louise and lose it all than admit they been had and its not what they were promised when they gave permission for others to control their lives even if it was voluntary (which just makes it peaceful and cheap)

  4. Americans are not pro-choice. There is no common principle that supports elective abortion or “planning” of a pro-choice cult or its members under the constitution, despite The Supreme Court’s discovery of a faith-based clause to summarily excise one of the named parties, “Posterity”, from the social contract. Any violence directed to abortionists and clinical cannibals (e.g. Planned Parenthood corporation), is carried out as an independent cause of the actor. It is not “right-wing”. At least not in America.

    That said, anarchists serve the interests of left-wing ideologues who seek to establish monopolies under the color of authority.

    ArtfldgrsGhost:

    Well, you have to give some credit to the “best and brightest” for establishing a cult that exploits people’s juvenile and base desires. Even though this is the default disposition of an undeveloped humanity, it still required some effort to convert a mature population.

  5. right wing is anything bad… then the left, after whipping up a bunch of fear about it, says it lives on feeding fear. My facebook feed has charts of about everything bad the US has done (including FDRs internment camps) and labels it all right wing.

    The left imported the whole concept of the right to the US. Truman mainstreamed it… while using it as a pejorative. Conservative, as a term, was started by the progressives… also as a pejorative.

  6. Rand (the think tank) has an on line database of terror attacks. Filtering for American domestic attacks since 9/11 shows most are done by environmentalists or animal rights activists.

  7. The DC Snipers were obviously an example of Islamic terrorism, as proved by the drawings made by the younger one in prison. Of course, this is denied by the government, just as Ft. Hood was.

  8. A lot of people think that Bush’s wars failed, but since they can’t prove that by pointing to Islamic jihad attacks in those years, what they are left to do is to attack it from another direction. That Islam isn’t to blame because Bush depopulated the terrorist cells so much that they had issues regenerating their cell based network in the US after intel captured from Iraq, eliminated them.

    So if you’re successful against Islam, that means you “lost a war” and that “Islam isn’t a threat”. But if you aren’t successful against Islam, that means you should obey Islam and that the West is guilty.

    Either way, doesn’t matter to the enemy how they have to justify it. They plan on winning, not having a debate.

  9. Are you feel more secure Ymarsakar?

    Bush’s wars results are irrelevant, what you see today on the street and town were security and spacial force starched of limits tells more of the reality of today life of fear rather been more saver.

  10. No one mentions the evil of Political Correctness and those in thrall to PC for poisoning the swamp so that terrorism cannot be correctly named, identified, and confronted.

    This subject is very much the swamp, as neo unpacks it. But the State Department lists groups responsible for terrorism, and about two-thirds on the list are Muslim.

    Is this really a lie? As the PC insist. Or is it closer to the Truth, which we still won’t identify? Nurturing domestic evils.

    I sure hope that president Trump or Cruz puts the Southern Poverty Law Center on the terrorist group list.
    I have seen it terrorize friends and acquaintances
    by merely listing and getting the media to report them.

  11. No one mentions the evil of Political Correctness and those in thrall to PC for poisoning the swamp so that terrorism cannot be correctly named, identified, and confronted.

    I call that Leftist mind control or WMD, Weapons of Mass Deception. It’s been on my research queue since 2008.

  12. Are you feel more secure Ymarsakar?

    When you start thinking your feelings have something to do with your security, you need a gut check on your surroundings.

    1. Gut instincts are real.
    2. They don’t work when your security is run by DC boys.

  13. Bush’s wars results are irrelevant, what you see today on the street and town were security and spacial force starched of limits tells more of the reality of today life of fear rather been more saver.

    Of course they are relevant. Without Bush’s intel, what you see today in 2015 would be what you would have experienced in 2009 and 2010.

    But because it didn’t happen, you think you know what’s going on. Because of your Feelings. But the train is fine, so you just feel your way through that intersection.

  14. Regarding your comments re: anarchists, it seems that they always show up at leftist marches/protests. No anarchists seen at Tea Party rallies.

    They don’t seem so difficult to categorize when you consider who they flock with.

  15. West:

    Well, maybe the anarchists at the Tea Party rallies are incognito.

    Seriously, though, there are anarchists who think/hope that the anarchic world would gravitate towards some sort of natural, organic, voluntary collectivism. Anarchists of the left, supposedly. Those of the right are more into individualism.

    But it seems to me that, once you’re into anarchism, you’re neither of left or right, you’re in another category. The labeling of anarchists as left or right is just a way for other people to make political points off them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>