Home » Maybe we should test the Globe on the meaning of the word “alleged”

Comments

Maybe we should test the Globe on the meaning of the word “alleged” — 10 Comments

  1. I would say his Chenkin’s use of the word ‘insure’ rather than ‘ensure’ may show that he’s actually a neo-con mole, trolling for Republican votes!

    All-in-all, I would much rather have someone like Bret Chenkin teach my kids than some Republican pedophile, like Phil Giordano of Waterbury, CT: granted, Phil was mayor and not a teacher but he ran against Joe-mentum Lieberman for the US Senate seat and many CT “wish-we-were-red” voters turned out, to vote for this slimeball.

  2. One of the reasons why the Left holds public education in their powerful special interest grasps, is because of their connections to some basic political groups situated in the American public.

    Destroy, manipulate, or weaken those political groups through the American public, and you won’t have such a double standard.

    The double standard isn’t the danger itself, it is the logistical power linkages between Unions, Teachers, Schools, and politicians.

    This makes cracking the political enigma, through the American people, a priority. This means, however, you need to be very very good at convincing people, knowing the truth, finding the truth, and taking out political opponents through the truth or even if you have to dig some skeletons out of the closet.

  3. I think the slippery use of ‘alleged’ will be defended by pointing to the news writing stylebook. You should say ‘alleged’ before someone is convicted… But this teacher is not going on trial and this is not a legal issue.

  4. Yeah. Speaking to the principal will sure as heck promote vigorous discussion.

    How come more people don’t use the term “tin ear”? Plenty of occasion.

  5. The whole thing is typical of what is going on. The worst part is the response:
    “Principal Sue Maguire said she hoped to speak to whoever complained about the quiz…”

  6. I continue to be amused by the accusations about expropriating the Constitution to one’s own nefarious ends, from a political Left that absolutely depends on being able to bend the Constitution’s intent (specifically, the intent to preserve a federal government limited in size, scope, and power) to advance its own progressive agenda. Chenkin and his ilk are notoriously selective in their insistence on that document’s defense…

  7. The Boston Globe headline is, of course, fraudulent. The teacher wasn’t under investigation for “alleged liberalism” but for alleged bias.

  8. Well, yes, but how do you deal with Wesley Knapp’s statement:

    “They (teachers) don’t have a license to hold forth on a particular standpoint.”

    On what subject? For what standpoint(s)?

    This is PC-induced empty-headedness. Of course teachers will “hold forth” on some standpoints–or why bother teaching history or philosophy?
    Stalinist revisionism of Russia’s history was a “standpoint” too, but making informed, civilized and thoughtful distinctions is what matters.
    No standpoint = any standpoint.
    Knap’s heart may be in the right place, but his mind is mush.

  9. Oh boy, you know, if a conservative would have come up with a similar blatantly biased quiz, there would have been no “alleged” nothing.

    (Hell, you dont even have to have any evidence of wrong-doing to be guilty of something!)

    The conservative teacher would have been fired. if this was a blue state, they would have demanded it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>