Home » ISIS has travel plans

Comments

ISIS has travel plans — 29 Comments

  1. “Warren uses the PC, administration-approved term “ISIL,” which is not what the group generally calls itself and ignores its Syrian connection.”

    Quite the contrary: ISIL specifically refers to the LEVANT, i.e. Syria all the way to the coast… PLUS Lebanon… PLUS Israel.

    Yep, al Baghdadi covets them all.

    ISIL was adopted by Barry only AFTER the MSM had centered itself on using ISIS as the term of art for al Baghdadi’s caliphate. Go back and review the Pentagon press briefings during the ‘transition’ — when both the Pentagon and the MSM were hopping back and forth using either or both sobriquets.

    ‘Tis but an indication of how vain Barry is. He wants to control the propaganda right on down to the wordage.

    This is what a Goebbels dictatorship would’ve sounded like: all warcraft by word smith.

    { Goebbels is the fellow who ginned up IRON CURTAIN — not Winnie. He placed it in his diaries — which Churchill was given the translation long before their release to the general public. Hence, most accounts — even now — place the term in Missouri. }

  2. I’m extremely doubtful that the Kurds have taken back territory from ISIS. The Kurds haven’t the firepower to push back ISIS, as they’re limited to small arms. There have been news reports that Obama has refused to upgrade the Kurds weaponry.

    If ISIS has lost ground, it’s because of Iran’s involvement. And it’s entirely in keeping with this administration’s duplicity that they would credit the Kurds, in order to deflect attention away from the gains that Iran is making. Obama and the Left do not want American’s remembering Netanyahu’s pointing out that, thanks to this administration, Iran now effectively controls four capitals in the M.E.

    Reportedly, the Israeli left now leads in the polls, if that turns out to be accurate and leftist traitors are elected in Netanyahu’s place, it is a declaration that the majority of Israel’s have decided to commit suicide. You can’t get more weak than that.

    As for ISIS versus ISIL, calling them ISIL is an implicit acknowledgement of their claim to the Levant and, an implicit declaration that Israel’s existence is illegitimate.

  3. For a couple of years after 9/11 I was hoping that the Muslim Ummah could become a force for moderation in Islam. Some Muslim experts talked about the Ummah tending to side with the “Strong Horse.” In fact, that was one of Osama bin Laden’s talking points. He planned for al Qaeda to become the Strong Horse. With our abrupt withdrawal from Somalia after the Mogadishu event, he believed, with good reason, that the U.S. did not have the stomach for gut wrenching, prolonged combat. ISIS is merely following bin Laden’s lead. They intend to become the Strong Horse. The young men (and some women) of the Ummah are flocking to them, which pretty much confirms the idea that the Ummah tends to back the Strong Horse.

    Obama and the progs have a quaint, naive idea that being weak and even-handed with Islam will win them over to moderation and tolerance. Much as they believe kindness and tolerance of anti-social behavior will transform black communities.

    My go to strategy has always been – Peace through superior fire power and the will to use it. We’ve got the firepower. What’s lacking is the will.

  4. As for ISIS versus ISIL, calling them ISIL is an implicit acknowledgement of their claim to the Levant and, an implicit declaration that Israel’s existence is illegitimate.

    You sound like someone engaging in ongoing high level strategy and diplomacy.

    The reality is quite different, is it not.

    What you wish to call it is very different from the things you attempted to ignore in the past and how powerless you are to do anything about it, relatively speaking.

  5. What’s lacking is the will.

    The Leftist alliance and their Islamic Jihad auxiliaries have plenty of willpower to use their firepower on you and others. But that’s not what people were thinking of, was it. They were thinking of enemies outside, while ignoring the enemies inside, as usual.

  6. First we take Manhattan, then we take Berlin…

    After you’ve been to Manhattan, why would you WANT to go to Hartford…?

    😀

  7. BTW, with regards to ISIS/ISIL/Al Queda

    You might consider this “endless” stream to be a method of identifying and killing the more fanatical and violent adherents of Islam, by getting them to stupidly get together in numbers too small to be a true force for change.

    I have no evidence to support that, but it is ONE side effect of the whole shebang.

    And it’s not the first time it has happened in history, by any means.

    So I would suggest that, even though Teh One is an utter tool here, it’s not beyond the intellect of some of the Rich Bastards to figure this out, just as I have, and have the power and connections to do something to foment it.

  8. }}} And it’s not the first time it has happened in history, by any means.

    BTW, the best example of this is the cowardice of the French.

    I maintain that that cowardice is a direct result of the Napoleonic Wars, which killed a really huge percent of the militant part of the French gene pool, rendering them into the mewling ineffectives they are today.

    Only the ones who held back, who found excuses not to go to Waterloo, to Moscow, survived and put their genes into the Frogs that followed.

  9. George Pal:

    I have always seen the lyrics of that LC song “Everybody Knows” as ironic, or at least partly ironic. In other words, I think he’s saying something like this: everybody spouts the usual line on these things, but is it all really true, or is most of it (or at least some of it) just people following the party or PC line?

    If you look at the actual lyrics—all of the lyrics, that is—I think my interpretation is correct. Leonard Cohen has never been one to talk about politics much if at all. He is purposely enigmatic, and I think the song has a double meaning. It sounds straightforward to those who think they “know” what “everybody knows.” But it’s not straightforward at all, IMHO.

    Some of the lyrics that seem clearly ironic, or mocking, for example:

    Everybody got this broken feeling
    Like their father or their dog just died

    Everybody talking to their pockets
    Everybody wants a box of chocolates
    And a long stem rose
    Everybody knows

    Everybody knows that you love me baby
    Everybody knows that you really do
    Everybody knows that you’ve been faithful
    Ah give or take a night or two
    Everybody knows you’ve been discreet
    But there were so many people you just had to meet
    Without your clothes
    And everybody knows…

    And everybody knows that it’s now or never
    Everybody knows that it’s me or you
    And everybody knows that you live forever
    Ah when you’ve done a line or two…

  10. Neo-neocon,

    I’ll go along with partly ironic as per the lyrics you quote, on the other hand, the lyrics previous to where you start seem expositional:

    Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
    Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed
    Everybody knows the war is over
    Everybody knows the good guys lost
    Everybody knows the fight was fixed
    The poor stay poor, the rich get rich
    That’s how it goes, everybody knows

    Everybody knows that the boat is leaking
    Everybody knows that the captain lied

  11. George Pal:

    But that’s my point. How do you know those earlier lyrics are meant to be taken straight?

    LC is not a political singer, and he is not a simple thinker either. He is a master of innuendo, and I’ve studied some of his interviews as well. From what I gather, he does not share those sentiments in the song in a straightforward way. It is my opinion that they are said at least somewhat ironically, as in “you all think it’s just this simple, don’t you?” and that the later lyrics—the ones that are clearly ironic—are a cue to his real attitude. I think his real attitude is, “things are seldom what they seem. What we think we know, we don’t really know.” That fits in with his personality and philosophy as I see it.

    Which reminds me of another song:

  12. If words have meaning, then their proper usage has importance. In this case, the implicit assumption that Israel has a right to exist. Call them ISIL and you’ve already started to abandon that position because you’ve yielded to their premise.

    “What you wish to call it is very different from the things you attempted to ignore in the past and how powerless you are to do anything about it, relatively speaking.” Ymarsakar

    Exactly what things did I ignore in the past? Hmm? Specifics please.

    As for my being powerless to do much about it, other than write, speak and vote for my representatives, what power does the average citizen have, other than that? We can not all be the fulcrum upon which the lever derives its leverage.

    What power do you have to do anything about it? That is, other than the same?

  13. Neo-neocon,

    I yield to your knowledge of the singer, and your point. Though, for me, the lyrics had always struck me as augury of personal dread, i.e., a paranoia of sorts, i.e., things are so bad, so balled up, so dark… and it’s all about to fall on me – ’cause everybody knows, that’s how it goes.

  14. Then again when Cohen sees “The Future” he sees…. at the end….

    “There’ll be the breaking of the ancient
    western code
    Your private life will suddenly explode
    There’ll be phantoms
    There’ll be fires on the road
    and the white man dancing
    You’ll see a woman
    hanging upside down
    her features covered by her fallen gown
    and all the lousy little poets
    coming round
    tryin’ to sound like Charlie Manson
    and the white man dancin’

    Give me back the Berlin wall
    Give me Stalin and St Paul
    Give me Christ
    or give me Hiroshima
    Destroy another fetus now
    We don’t like children anyhow
    I’ve seen the future, baby:
    it is murder “

  15. To most ironic and folish contributing to the enamy of humanity propaganda. Saying ISIS has travel plans is just some uniformed unreal of all truths and realtirs,

    With huge investment in intelligence and othe tools like ANS screeing with militry on the ground in the land of the enamy all that telling here ISIS has travel plans?

    What nonnces

  16. Japan,

    Unfortunately, your lack of fluency in English makes it hard to understand what you have said. But anyone who cavalierly dismisses ISIS’ capabilities is a fool. 19 men with just box cutters killed 3000+ Americans and, if they had been on a later flight, the death toll would have been at least 10 times that.

  17. Geoffrey Britain
    Its not sham been Eng. not my native language.
    But looks you the point. Have said that you either from another plant or you in deep sleep with ISIS or ISL creation from been a baby to adulthood… So from Syria for regime change across Turku now have 3rd Iraq land.

    Did you follow US force in the region how many air strike a day?

    Go and do your homework Mr cavalierly …..

  18. Japan, I repeat, increase your fluency in English if you wish to have a discussion, otherwise you will find yourself ignored.

    Nothing I said implied shame that English is not your first language. That is your insecurity speaking. I simply advised you to increase your fluency so as to be better understood.

    I’ve been aware of ISIS as soon as they started making the news in English and took them seriously from the start and have followed their progress.

    The American air strikes are a bad joke and for appearances sake only. I’m up to date on my homework. Nothing I’ve said regarding ISIS could be taken as dismissive. As for yourself, “if the shoe fits, wear it”.

  19. Going from reports from the British Independent, I gather that the Kurds are supported by sorties from the USAAF which limit the mobility of ISIS, so that it is not so much that ground has been retaken as that ISIS no longer has the ability to move troops which is giving the Kurdish Peshmerga the strength to defend their territory.
    Meanwhile the assault on Tikrit is being undertaken by Shi’ite Militias advised, if not actually led by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, supported by some local Sunni militias siding with the Shi’ites due to obscure grudges. I presume the US is staying out of this because it is a sectarian campaign which will culminate in some gruesome civilian casualties should it be successful.

  20. Sorry the West, Kurds’ Fight is Not Your Fight

    kurdistantribune.com/2015/sorry-west-kurds-fight-not-your-fight

  21. Caedmon Says:
    March 15th, 2015 at 5:16 am

    Going from reports from the British Independent, ….

    If you’re willing to believe your lying eyes…

    The ENTIRE Tikrit ‘project’ is Iranian commanded.

    For photographic evidences — visit the Long War Journal.

    http://www.longwarjournal.org/

    Al Quds has totally taken over — be of no doubt about that.

  22. Pingback:Abu Dhabi escort girl

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>