Home » A year and a half ago, it was the left that was (or pretended to be) concerned about election fraud

Comments

A year and a half ago, it was the <i>left</i> that was (or pretended to be) concerned about election fraud — 9 Comments

  1. The always interesting Andrea Widburg has recently labelled as “sordid, craven, and disgraceful” The National Review for attacking Trump and tens of millions of voters over their allegations of a stolen election. At this point, it is not only the MSM hysterically calling the claims of “fraud” baseless, but the still-influential, though increasingly irrelevant, Never-Trumpers on the so-called conservative side who refuse to accept all the evidence, gathered within the last four weeks, of numerical and statistical impossibilities, of widespread illegalities and anomalies, of significant problems with shady foreign companies in charge of the processing of votes, and of hundreds of signed affidavits alleging irregular and often illicit behavior at polling stations. Trump and his supporters are now fighting not only against the left, but also against weak and cowardly GOP swamp-creatures and much of the conservative establishment.

  2. Speaking of election fraud, I found the brief dated today in the PA election fraud case.

    Neo: I sent you my blog post on it. Please look at it.

    I think we win this case. Piece of cake.

  3. It looks like today Barr dug his rep deeper south-wise, with Fox Memphis’ M. Balsamo
    (see https://www.fox13memphis.com/news/politics/barr-no-evidence/YFOZVAXLK3KGQXSINNC75JH2G4/)
    putting it thusly:

    ——-
    “To date, we have not seen *fraud on a scale* that could have affected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told the AP.
    The comments are *especially direct* coming from Barr, who has been one of the president’s most ardent allies….
    Attorney Sidney Powell has *spun fictional* tales of election systems flipping votes, German servers storing U.S. voting information and election software created in Venezuela “at the direction of Hugo Chavez,” – the late Venezuelan president who died in 2013.
    Powell has since been removed from the legal team, after an interview she gave where she threatened to “blow up” Georgia with a “biblical” court filing.”
    ——–

    The part about “Powell has *spun fictional* tales” has a link to an AP diatribe from 19 Nov., on
    “AP FACT CHECK: Trump legal team’s batch of false vote claims”, by Ali Swenson.
    (As if no major evidence has emerged since 19 Nov.!)

    I can’t see why Barr would be so “especially direct” about this now, esp. insofar as his probe is still ongoing.
    If it’s been closed, he should come clean about that.
    WTF?

    And, just in, Rudy & Sidney have dissed this outburst, claiming that the DoJ has done virtually zip to follow up the leads they’ve given the dept.
    And, Barr has named Durham as a SC, for a “narrow in scope” probe of SpyGate.

  4. 2016 Trump voters, for winning: The Deplorabes
    2020 Trump voters, for questioning the outcome: “sordid, craven, and disgraceful”

    Andrea probably believes people who were anti-Trumpers were the victims of god knows what throughout the past four years.

  5. “pretended to be” are the key words in that title. The left’s only principles are power and control.

  6. I think that, “Russia-Russia-Russia”, was supposed to be the white dress that would protect the Corruptocrats and Ghettocrats when the Kraken kicked in the whorehouse door. Maybe some pardons and mercy so that there will be survivors to mop up the carnage.

    I have seen what they did to the cities that they over-ran and can tell what they had planned for our entire Republic, so I don’t feel merciful this Holiday season, but I do need something festive and appropriate to hang on my tree and light post.

    Looks like a lot of ugly in that package…….

  7. ” . . . the always interesting Andrea Widburg . . .”

    For those who may not know, Andrea Widburg is the blogger at bookwormroom.com, listed in neo’s blogroll.

  8. GRA on December 1, 2020 at 5:47 pm said:
    2016 Trump voters, for winning: The Deplorabes
    2020 Trump voters, for questioning the outcome: “sordid, craven, and disgraceful”

    Andrea probably believes people who were anti-Trumpers were the victims of god knows what throughout the past four years.

    I think you may have read that wrong. The National Review was calling those T reds sordid, and American Thinker called them out on it.

  9. Gotta say, here in Ohio, this year the machines printed out a paper ballot (as they had before) but this year the voter took the ballot, could read it, and THEN put it in the ballot box. Good security. Ohio isn’t in question either. Go figure.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>