Another aspect of the 2020 election that might have affected the results
Retired senior DoD analyst Ray Blehar has examined an underreported election story pertaining to write-in and minor party ballots/votes. His investigation has resulted in some startling conclusions and a working theory: that Biden’s margin of victory in several key states could have been provided by shifting write-in and minor party ballots through ballot adjudication.
Hard to say, but it’s another interesting angle.
I just read it too. Combine this with the Molly Ball Time article it shows the effort put forth to steal the election.
https://time.com/tag/2020-election/
I have been a bit skeptical about machine manipulation particularly votes being sent overseas but dang does this look suspicious. I don’t know if the Arizona audit is designed to catch it but the Windham NH machine audit should. However there appears to be an effort to undermine that audit by the selection of sketchy audit teams.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/breaking-windham-residents-stand-backs-turned-board-railroad-audit-process-scream-chant-resign-video/
I worked Internal Controls for years. One method to detect fraud is ratio analysis from one set of metrics to the one under study. ALL ratio analysis have turned up red for fraud in this past election. We have to keep working to expose it. Also fix it so it will never happen again.
The adjudication grift was talked about months ago.
It’s connected IIRC, at least in part, with the number of mail-in votes that were NOT thrown out (for a variety of reasons) in the 2020 election relative to elections in the past.
Past elections saw quite a large percentage of mail-in votes disallowed (I’m not sure of the actual numbers but they’re out there—6%? 8% 10? More?
2020 saw this number reduced to a very low—an absurdly low—percentage.
And you’ll never guess to whom most, if not all, of those “adjudicated” ballots went…
The Dems had 50 ways to steal the election and they used all of them. And after they did it, they bragged about it in Time magazine. Nothing happened.
It infuriates me that the GOPe just goes along as if nothing wrong happened. And, of course, the FBI did nothing.
Just to many irregularities in statistics, 2022 election will go same way if nothing throws a wrench in the gears. And the statistics won’t play out anywhere near 2020.
And even in spite of widespread use of this adjudication “method” for siphoning votes towards Biden, it was still necessary to transport vanloads and truckloads of fake ballots (for example into Pennsylvania).
Which explains, per the TIME Magazine article why “the cabal” was really not worried about Trump’s surging numbers as the voting progressed into the early hours of the morning. Not a bit worried. (Since all you have to do is stop the counting for a few hours….in multiple states!)
Keeping in mind that most of these fake ballots were for the Presidential candidate ONLY. (I.e., There was no time to fill in the rest of the ballot—which explains the discrepancy between Biden’s “record breaking victory” and the unexpectedly dismal results of the House races for the Democrats (i.e., the No-Coattails phenomenon).
Keeping in mind that most of these fake ballots were for the Presidential candidate ONLY. (I.e., There was no time to fill in the rest of the ballot—which explains the discrepancy between Biden’s “record breaking victory” and the unexpectedly dismal results of the House races for the Democrats (i.e., the No-Coattails phenomenon).
This is why I am still hopeful about 2022.
Adjudication was a big issue right after the election. I remember a video where a woman who was an election worker showed how it worked and demonstrated turning a Trump vote into a Biden vote. She also showed that it was possible to create blocks of votes from blank ballots. Anyone who was an “adjudicator” had that power without any oversight or paper trail.
I think it was at the Georgia Senate hearings, https://youtu.be/u5ZP_HpBKos, but haven’t been able to locate the testimony. It does include the surveillance video of the election worker sending the same ballots through the tabulating machine multiple times.
I analyze data for a living and nothing about this past election passes the smell test. Could it be the tail end of the curve? Sure, such things do happen, but you need solid proof that that’s exactly what did happen. Simply asserting that everything was fine does not provide that proof.
For the sake of argument, let’s say the vote fraud, any and all varieties, alleged to have happened did happen. Did it happen in every state? Or just in pivotal swing states? How can we explain that independent actors, the vast lot of whom had no contact with one another, did the same thing in all these states?
What in the heck gave precinct workers the idea that they could alter ballots? The mind boggles. I can’t recall which account of fraud this comes from (it may be Blehar), but the claim is that in PA, Trump, instead of losing by some 80,000 votes, actually won by 180,000 votes because of falsification of WI&MPBs.
I’m not saying it didn’t happen. Statistics and suspicions speak volumes in this case. Other problem: hundreds and hundreds of precinct workers had to be involved in this fraud, in more than one state.
And no one has talked?
Other sneaking suspicion. If the vote fraud turns out to be true, then it’s been going on for a while. SOP. What changed this time out was scale.
Titan28:
Did you read the Time article? It indicates tremendous nationwide coordination that certainly could have included those in charge of elections.
In addition, they wouldn’t have needed so many people in order to do it, because all that would be necessary would be to identify swing states and identify large blue cities in those swing states. The latter is quite obvious – for example Atlanta in Georgia, Philadelphia in Pennsylvania. These are such blue cities that some enormous percentage of the population of the city always votes for Democrats, and there are precincts in which it really does approach 100%. The poll workers don’t have to all be crooked, either. They just have to receive the right instructions from the higher-ups about the rules for adjudication and/or signature verification, for example, and if they follow those very liberal rules there are tons more votes for Democrats.
Plus ballot harvesting, throwing out opposition observers or making them stay too far away to see, and tons of other things. It all would only have to be done in one key city in each swing state, for example. And those cities would be easy to identify ahead of time.
And no one has talked? — Titan28
There were some people who talked. There was a lady in a Pennsylvania group of perhaps a dozen or thereabouts who were being trained in fraud techniques. When she realized the scale or scope of the activities she signed an affidavit telling her story. Within a day or two there a few affidavits signed by people who had been in the room with her who denied everything she said.
Then there was the (Michigan?) postal worker who was toiling behind a stack of containers out of sight, when he overheard the postmaster talking about all the ballots he was going to backdate. He filed a complaint with the Postal Inspectors Service and they sent a investigator.
The worker recorded (audio only) the interrogation unbeknownst to the investigator and it was published by Project Veritas. I listened to about 30 min. of the 1.5 or 2 hour recording. It is quite amazing. The investigator was a master manipulator who had no intention of rectifying any such postal fraud. Part of the problem with that case was that the worker did not witness the act, only a discussion of the intent to act.
I’m not trying to tweak Titan28. I just want to emphasized that “these people” have planned for redundancies and backups upon backups.
Regarding the blue cities cheating. Remember that in 2016 Jill Stein (aka Hillary) asked for a recount in a number of states. They didn’t uncover any extra votes for Hillary. The most entertaining recount was in Michigan. All the counties were confirming their election day results until they got to Wayne County, that is, Detroit. The counters opened bags of votes to do the check. The tag on the outside would say 50 for Hillary, but there would only be 7 real ballots inside. After doing this a number of times, the recount was halted and Trump declared the winner.
The 2016 California primary was very suspicious. Berny was drawing large crowds and Hillary was drawing flies but she managed to win it somehow. The explanation at the time was that It was the (deathly) silent majority. No one could figure it out at the time. The Berny bros suddenly figured it out in 2020.
I think that what we saw was the culmination of all the years of practice at vote stealing refined and unleashed in 2020.
Robert Barnes and the People’s Pundit were discussing the census results, which have tracked presidential elections since 1966. In each case, the census has correlated to the balloting results with quite good accuracy, and any differences are shown with a slight over-prediction on the census side.
This year’s census shows a disparity of about 5 million votes. Hmm. A disparity where the ballot count exceeds the census’s correlative vote tally by –Presto!– the approximate Biden winning margin. First time in history. Hmm.
Virtually all of the correlations used to sense-check presidential elections have turned up with wild cards. I’m sure there is a list somewhere of these, and it would be instructive to review it, as well as a table of the actual census / ballot comparisons through the years. Everybody knows something is very fishy. Everybody knows that Democrats are historically very effective at vote-fixing.
Why is it they are not often caught, until they start doing flagrantly illegal things in open public, like the coordinated halt of vote-counting in battleground states, or taping up poster board on the windows so outsiders can’t see the count, after running out the Republican poll workers? How can the protective precinct machinery be so good at keeping these activities cloaked? The answer is obvious: The establishment Republicans and Media are enabler/facilitators I think…
Glenn Greenwald is on fire pointing this stuff out right now……
One point of the 2020 election cycle comes to mind and it relates to Titan28’s comment about voting fraud going on for a long time. The current GOP leader in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, was not well liked in his home state, but his primary victory was (I think) by +27%. It is possible that Trump’s support pushed him over the top, or it could have been a few extra votes. If that’s true, how can we trust any politician?
As mentioned in earlier posts. I was at Detroit TCF and SAW the fraud. That is how I became an activist. Almost every person at TCF has become one too.
One assignment I got was to investigate non-swing state fraud. And there was a bunch of it. The reason was to make sure that Trump could not declare himself the winner via popular vote. What this article is about shows that no way Biden got 81M votes.
Below is a summary of the introduction of the paper I am writing. It may add context to why and how the great steal was allowed to happen.
RNC was under a 30 year consent decree not to get involved with local election processes. State parties were allowed to do so but because of the national decree were reluctant to get deeply involved because they could be branded as racists and obstructionist. Because of that in Democratic strongholds, loose election practices were allowed to develop like walk around money and other forms of ballot harvesting such as practiced in Milwaukee in the Somali district. All of this was known but allowed to continue with willful neglect. Hence over the years these practices were developed and honed so when mechanisms were needed for increased to ramp up the need for ballots (not votes) they were in place.
The Consent Decree ended in 2019. But RNC lost “institutional” memory on how to handle election processes challenges. Also as was made apparent, the RNC didn’t have a battleplan to pull resources together. The RNC could have mobilized state resources such as Florida or Georgia that recently conducted election process reform. The Trump Campaign didn’t work closely with RNC and vice versa. Thus the myriad dis-jointed Lone Ranger attempts were made to get the corrective action implemented. All which ultimately failed.
@Spartacus:
Very good background info, thanks!
RNC did not appear to be very focused on potential voter fraud in 2020. There was / is a huge amount of never Trumpers in the eGOP. The head of the Ca gop is a never Trumper, that’s election I heard was strange…
And interesting that Kevin McCarthy is renting from “resistance”, ex gop, but not a never Trumper, eGOP loved pollster Frank Luntz.
There seems to be a lot of establishment GOP that aided and abetted the steal, and it’s only due grass roots outcry they are doing anything.
“And interesting that Kevin McCarthy is renting from “resistance”, ex gop, but not a never Trumper, eGOP loved pollster Frank Luntz.”
Wait until we hear about the Rent Boys.
Burn. It. Down.
I love this little tidbit from the Redstate post.
“WIMP. This is an acronym that stands for the sum of write-in and minor party ballots in a given state.”