Home » Memorial Day: on patriotism

Comments

Memorial Day: on patriotism — 4 Comments

  1. I remember reading the story “The Man Without a Country” in the 7th grade, I thought it was a bit harsh however a person needed to feel that way to understand the point of the story. I was up early this morning putting my American Flag up, enjoying the early morning cool air and listening to the birds. Somehow or another our younger generation, three families with our kids ranging from 39 to 48 years old share our same love of our country and they are trying to pass that on to their children.

    If we are to move on through this current phase of disliking our flag and nation and that is a big if we need to find a way to share the feeling that the United States of America is an incredible, great, unique nation with a powerful history or righting wrongs and allowing individual freedom like no other nation, ever.

    Of course part of heritage is the willingness to go to war and make sacrifices including personal death to keep us going. I have trouble putting all of this stuff together, the stuff I know and the stuff I feel. Recently I discovered more personal family history linking us to early English settlers who came to Concord Massachusetts in 1648, the first generation in the US and one of the first sons fought in the Narragansett War in 1675 when every able bodied man between 17 and 49 was required to have his own weapons and report for duty when called up, that was New England at that time.

    I always knew I was a son of the South with family here before 1750 and most living in states where the men fought for the South in the Civil War, except for one great-granddad in Tennessee, a border state where he was a Baptist preacher and become a cavalry captain.

    Another great-granddad, Sutherland from Arkansas was an infantry man who never smiled again when he returned from the war. It seems as if the only war and police actions up to now some family member was missing from was the Spanish American war.

    So today, Memorial Day I remember my dad who along with my uncles served during WWII hugging me in 1966 when I went into the service and I missed by one week being in the group that went to Viet Nam from my advanced school. My parents were proud of me and scared to death but they knew that being in the service, like my older brother in the 1950’s was what we did, no question about it, that’s what we did.

    The old WWII and Korean war men in my family are now gone, some coming back kind of shot up and worn out but good family men. The most recent I have visited with, step nephew who was a Stryker driver in Iraq and Nieces husband who has done numerous deployments to Afghanistan and Iraq have been frustrated with the military but think things are probably getting bit better.

    I understand there a people who don’t know many who have served and I feel honored to live in an area where a good deal of my friends are Vets so when I put my flag out in the morning I know there are lots of friends and family who feel, in their bones the heritage of paying the price. Sorry for the sappy but I am glad we can speak our mind and thank all of you, Neo and those who comment who freely share their opinions.

  2. “But patriotism and nationalism seem to have been rejected by a large segment of Europeans even earlier, as a result of the devastation both sentiments were seen to have wrought on that continent during WWI and WWII.” neo

    Yoram Hazony is an Israeli philosopher, Biblical scholar and political theorist. In 2010, his article “Israel Through European Eyes” first shed light for me on the motivation for Western Europe’s animosity toward the very existence of Israel.

    In 1795, the German philosopher Immanuel Kant wrote his manifesto entitled, “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch”

    Hazony argues it to lie at the heart of the Western Left’s hostility to the nation state;

    “In it, Kant issued a famous and explicit attack on the ideal of the nation-state, comparing national self-determination to the lawless freedom of savages, which, he said, is rightly detested as “barbarism,” and a “brutish debasement of humanity.”

    “In Perpetual Peace, then, Kant argues that the establishment of a universal state, which will “grow until it embraced all the people of the earth,” is the only possible dictate of reason.

    Human beings who do not agree to the subordination of their national interests to the decisions of such a universal state are seen as opposing the historical march of humanity toward reason. The supporters of the nation-state are seen as supporting a violent egoism on an international scale, which is as much an abdication of morals as the insistence of violent egoism in our personal lives.

    For many years, the Kantian paradigm, which imputed an intrinsic immorality to the institution of the national state, found few takers in Europe. In the 19th century, it was embraced by a minuscule number of Communists and utopians, and a handful of Catholic reactionaries.

    But the 20th century was a different story. The Soviets and Marxists blamed the carnage of the two world wars on the order of nation-states. This was an argument that had little traction in the European mainstream between the wars. But after World War II, when Nazism was added to the list of crimes attributed to the nation-state, the result was very different. Nazism was seen as the rotten fruit of the German nation-state, and Kant looked to have been right all along: For the nations to arm themselves, and to determine for themselves when to use these arms, was now seen as barbarism and a brutish debasement of humanity.”

    After WWII, Kant’s POV became formalized into the theory of “Trans-nationalism” which is…

    “the engine driving the movement toward European Union, [and] has already been overwhelming. Both in Europe and in North America, we are watching the growth of a generation of young people that, for the first time in 350 years, does not recognize the nation-state as the foundation of our freedoms. Indeed, there is a powerful new paradigm abroad, which sees us doing without such states. And it has unleashed a tidal wave of consequences, for those who embrace it and for those who do not.”

    Trans-nationalism is a collectivist POV and naturally aligns with Marxism, multi-culturalism, post modernism, et al on the Left.

    I strongly encourage everyone to read Hazony’s article, which holds many more riches for the reader and, is also astonishingly prescient.

    PS: I also recommend Hazony’s 2016 essay; “Nationalism and the Future of Western Freedom”
    “A conflict is brewing over the shape of the international order. It centers around an idea–a biblical idea–long thought discredited by political elites.”

  3. Did you see the story about the high-school softball crowd in Fresno? The game was a double-header and they don’t play the national anthem before the second game. Apparently that policy was unfamiliar; when it was announced that the anthem would not be played, people booed, and then they spontaneously sang it! Very nice. Apparently they’re now going to change the policy and sing it before both games.

    http://www.fresnobee.com/sports/high-school/article211991974.html

  4. Quisling was rather the opposite lesson from WWII. But seemingly few people know it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>