…that I have so far written 467 posts with the tag “Obama.” ARGHHHH!!!!
Comments
It has recently been pointed out to me… — 13 Comments
Clearly, you have a “thang” for this dude and are unable to admit it. Don’t you have a background in psychology? Get some help, girl!
The gift that keeps on giving.
–
LOL. And, as I recall, all of them were sweet and gentle.
Hopefully after next November writing about Obama will be as worthwhile and relevant as writing about Millard Fillmore.
Must be some intrinsic fascination with the subject’s character makeup, or lack thereof. Speaking of which – I pulled this from SondraK’s blog (Knowledge Is Power) that has me scratching my head wondering. If what I’m reading into it, and if it actually is a poem Obama wrote in college, does it perhaps explain some of the very noticable characteristics we have grown to know, speculate on, and loath to some extent? The specific poem is “POP” and I may be imaging nothing more than maggots in a bowl of rice.(http://www.obamapedia.org/page/Obama+Poems)
Here’s another Obama problem for us to worry about:
Say rather “I have so far written 467 posts with the tag “Obama” but he does not rule my life! I can give him up anytime. Honest!”
I also note that although this one is tagged “Uncategorized” it really makes 468!
You could have used the tag “Narxist” and cut that number by 95%.
I learn more about Obama on this blog than at just about any other source except for American Thinker–a great source for Obama material.
Obama is worth writing about just as Caligula is worth writing about. In one of your Obama posts you made that comparison, and I was so happy because I’ve always seen the parallels, but think that it sounds like I’m exaggerating. Because of your well-written post, others will now see the similarities. Obama is potentially more dangerous, however.
Obama is the kind of leader one might find in a science-fiction novel–outlandish, unbelievable, and quite possible. There have probably been many leaders of important countries that share Obamaoid characteristics. Didn’t one Roman emperor–Heliogabolis–suffocate his followers in rose petals? Muammar Kadafi is no mental prize either.
It could be worse. Such as 467 issues of Time with Obama’s picture on the cover.
Wow…I’m not sure how I missed that posting! While the true meaning of “POP” is securely locked in Obama’s head, and realizing he was in college when he wrote it, I would guess if it were penned in similar context by any middle-school or high school student the authorities would be in the student’s house within a day or two. The possiblities that can be read into “POP” don’t go very far in easing my concerns about this President or what he’s capable (or incapable) of doing.
Leave a Reply
HTML tags allowed in your
comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>
Clearly, you have a “thang” for this dude and are unable to admit it. Don’t you have a background in psychology? Get some help, girl!
The gift that keeps on giving.
–
LOL. And, as I recall, all of them were sweet and gentle.
Hopefully after next November writing about Obama will be as worthwhile and relevant as writing about Millard Fillmore.
Must be some intrinsic fascination with the subject’s character makeup, or lack thereof. Speaking of which – I pulled this from SondraK’s blog (Knowledge Is Power) that has me scratching my head wondering. If what I’m reading into it, and if it actually is a poem Obama wrote in college, does it perhaps explain some of the very noticable characteristics we have grown to know, speculate on, and loath to some extent? The specific poem is “POP” and I may be imaging nothing more than maggots in a bowl of rice.(http://www.obamapedia.org/page/Obama+Poems)
Here’s another Obama problem for us to worry about:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/03/12/brian-w-doherty-sleep-weary-white-house-obama/
Poor baby is tired.
Say rather “I have so far written 467 posts with the tag “Obama” but he does not rule my life! I can give him up anytime. Honest!”
I also note that although this one is tagged “Uncategorized” it really makes 468!
You could have used the tag “Narxist” and cut that number by 95%.
I learn more about Obama on this blog than at just about any other source except for American Thinker–a great source for Obama material.
Obama is worth writing about just as Caligula is worth writing about. In one of your Obama posts you made that comparison, and I was so happy because I’ve always seen the parallels, but think that it sounds like I’m exaggerating. Because of your well-written post, others will now see the similarities. Obama is potentially more dangerous, however.
Obama is the kind of leader one might find in a science-fiction novel–outlandish, unbelievable, and quite possible. There have probably been many leaders of important countries that share Obamaoid characteristics. Didn’t one Roman emperor–Heliogabolis–suffocate his followers in rose petals? Muammar Kadafi is no mental prize either.
SteddieH In OR: see this.
It could be worse. Such as 467 issues of Time with Obama’s picture on the cover.
Wow…I’m not sure how I missed that posting! While the true meaning of “POP” is securely locked in Obama’s head, and realizing he was in college when he wrote it, I would guess if it were penned in similar context by any middle-school or high school student the authorities would be in the student’s house within a day or two. The possiblities that can be read into “POP” don’t go very far in easing my concerns about this President or what he’s capable (or incapable) of doing.