See the AP headline; read the AP story
Our old friend Jennifer Loven reports on what was essentially a cooperative meeting between ally Karzai and President Bush, and tries her best to spin it into a quarrel.
I know that reporters generally don’t write their own headlines, so I probably can’t blame her for that, but I can blame someone at the AP. Take a look: the headline reads “Bush rebuffs Karzai’s request on troops.” Then read the story, and decide whether you think the headline accurately portrays the gist of the situation, and the tenor and spirit of the meeting and the press conference.
Ms. Loven also writes:
Karzai thanked Bush for helping to put his country on the path to democracy. But he also came to their meeting with a long list of grievances.
I always imagine that journalists know the meaning of the words they use, and choose them quite carefully. I would suggest to Ms. Loven that the proper word would be “requests,” not “grievances.”
A couple of days ago, the headlines about Karzai all read something like this (I can’t find the links, but this is what I recall), “Karzai blasts US for Afghan prison abuse.” But, if you look at the transcript of today’s press conference, you read something quite different from Karzai:
On the question of the prisoner abuse, we are, of course, sad about that. But let me make sure that you all know that that does not reflect on the American people.
Right now in Afghanistan there is an Italian lady that has been kidnapped by an Afghan man, while there are hundreds of Afghan women demonstrating outside in the streets of Kabul demanding the release of that woman, the Italian lady.
So the prisoner abuse thing is not at all a thing that we attribute to anybody else but those individuals. The Afghan people are grateful very, very much to the American people, and recognize that individual acts do not reflect either on governments or on societies. These things happen everywhere.
Karzai–a devout Moslem–shows the same sort of common sense on the subject of Newsweek and the Koran-flushing story:
[The riots] were more against the elections in Afghanistan. They were more against the progress in Afghanistan. They were more against the strategic partnership with the United States.
We know who did it. We know the guys. We know the people behind those demonstrations. And unfortunately you don’t, here, follow the Afghan press. But if you listen to the Voice of America, the Radio Liberty and the BBC, the Afghan population condemned those acts of arson in Afghanistan.
Of course, we are, as Muslims, very much unhappy with Newsweek bringing a matter so serious in the gossip column. It’s really something that one shouldn’t do, that responsible journalism shouldn’t do at all.
But Newsweek story is not America’s story. That’s what we understand in Afghanistan.
So, Newsweek is losing credibility all over the world. I can’t say that makes me weep. Sometimes I think that, if the MSM can’t be objective, and can’t put things in the proper context, they should just publish the transcripts and call it a day. Let us be the judges of what people are actually saying and meaning, and be done with the middlemen/women oh-so-helpfully “interpreting” it all for us.
And yes, the usual suspects will probably call Karzai an American puppet and Bush’s willing tool. I find it hard to understand how anyone can look at the man and listen to him, and still doubt his deep integrity and sincerity, not to mention his sheer courage.
I can’t find my source right now, but I’m 99.9% certain that Loven is married to a high muckety muck in the DNC or some other Democratic political operation. Power Line (I think) has pointed out before that her articles are clearly just re-dos of his press releases.
Probably a worthless effort but I have, on more than one occasion,written a letter to my Knoxville paper asking who the heck writes the headline for a story. At times there is such a dismaying disconnect between the content of an article and the headline. It maddens me because headlines hold a lot of power- often that is all most people have the time to read.It just seems like sneaky cheating on the part of the MSM to play games with words like that.
This sort of stuff comes back to haunt, time and again and continues to erode the credibility of news outlets who only want to foist a political agenda. Dan Rather and Newsweek whose malicious reporting actually caused the deaths of some people comes to mind. It slowly reaches a point of no return when credibility issues can’t be overcome. Fools hang themselves with the shoestrings from their feet in their mouths.
“I find it hard to understand how anyone can look at the man and listen to him, and still doubt his deep integrity and sincerity, not to mention his sheer courage.”
Well, exactly. That’s WHY they must try so desperately to bring him down.
It is their own integrity and courage that they doubt.
Neo, once again, thanks for setting the story straight. After I read and heard headlines similar to the ones you mentioned, I thought, “There’s GOT to be more to this …” but I didn’t have the time or patience to dig through the articles to find out what was really going on.
Huan … sadly, it’s getting harder and harder for the MSM to disappoint me about anything.
Neo, don’t be too surprised about this; the leftist MSM has been functioning in this manner for years. It amazes me that they are able to get away with it on a daily basis. You noticed the Headline didn’t match the content of the story, but I wonder how many others do?
Polls are what get me fired up. The MSM love to twist poll data to conform to their positions. Media outlets that use poll data should be required to post the actual questions posed to respondants.
the MSM have become a disappointment. The most important function of a free press in a democratic society is to educate the public. Only an educated public can direct political policies. Instead the MSM have elected to direct political policies through influencing the public through duplicity of omission and outright fabrication.
the real bright spot has been a public that keeps its own counsel rather than fall prey to the media. when will the MSM learn.