Home » The UN’s plans for the control of “migration”

Comments

The UN’s plans for the control of “migration” — 7 Comments

  1. The #1 reason that globalist ideology is unlikely to succeed, is Russia & China.

    The #2 reason it’s DOA, is the UN.

    Rankings are negotiable.

  2. Like Dems/Progs everywhere, the UN wants to control everything, everywhere. It is long overdue for a change of venue, Sub-Saharan Africa sounds great. Let’s see how many Despots brothers-in-law will still want to be Ambassadors. Perhaps.a site in Kenya, maybe Kinshasa could be utilized. Cost of living should be low.

  3. Why doesn’t the UN start by declaring that all member nations must provide for their own citizens the rights and protections they decree are the privilege of all immigrants to anywhere?
    Once they get that done, no one will have to leave home for a better place.

  4. It is long overdue for a change of venue, Sub-Saharan Africa sounds great. Let’s see how many Despots brothers-in-law will still want to be Ambassadors. Perhaps.a site in Kenya, maybe Kinshasa could be utilized.

    If Kenya, NOT its capital of Nairobi, as its mountain setting gives it a pleasant climate. Kinshasa sounds good. Maybe Lagos in Nigeria.

  5. “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean–neither more nor less.”
    Once you control the definition of a word, you control (win) the argument.
    The difference here are the definitions of migration vs invasion, the latter being “an unwelcome intrusion into another’s domain.” OED

  6. Just in terms of their sheer incompetence (much less their ideology, voting record, and performance on the ground), I wouldn’t allow the UN to run a corner lemonade stand.

    It hardly made the news except in stamp collecting circles, but back in 2003 one or more people at the UN were able to arrange things so that some person or persons were able to back up a couple of trucks to UN Headquarters and have them loaded up with the UN’s unique and irreplaceable Stamp Archive, according to reports 77 boxes containing hundreds of thousands of items—a metric ton of original designs/drawings for stamps, dies, proofs, many hundreds of thousands of stamps, and associated items.

    Information about this whole incident is extremely “hazy” and imprecise, and the UN says that it has found no records of this transaction; a sale of unique, irreplaceable, and supposedly “inviolable” UN assets that UN regulations said were forbidden to be sold, a sale of UN property which nobody who should have been aware of and signed off on/or blocked supposedly knew about or approved.

    Sometime later in 2003 these irreplaceable items were bought by a collector at auction in Geneva, Switzerland, reportedly for a paltry $3+ million dollars, and since then this one of a kind collection has reportedly been split up, and pieces of it sold and resold.

    According to the article cited below, the UN did receive more than $2.5 million of the auction proceeds, but the items sold are literally “unique” and “irreplaceable,” and apparently worth far more that a couple of million dollars.

    (One wonders how the UN was able to receive that $2 .5 million in proceeds from this auction if no one at the UN was on some sort of paperwork as having been involved in this sale?)

    Reports from when this happened, in 2003, quote UN officials as saying that “the UN was investigating.”

    Curiously, over the years since this happened the UN has not bothered to publicize this incident, and the loss of its irreplaceable Stamp Archive is not mentioned on the website of the UN Postal Administration.

    To quote from the 2015 article linked below:

    “The postal archive sale may be yet another instance of what Paul Volcker’s investigation into the Oil-for-Food scandal described as “systemic problems in United Nations’ administration,” involving lack of accountability, oversight, or even basic clarity in the organization’s activities. Despite the historic importance of the postal archive, senior U.N. officials contacted by FOX News professed to know nothing about it — including some in departments specifically charged with approving or blocking the dispersion of U.N. historical material.”

    During a brief search of the Internet, I was not able to find the text of the “Report” on this matter that the UN said—back in 2015 (12 years after the event in question)—that it was still preparing.

    See https://www.foxnews.com/story/united-nations-probes-sale-of-irreplaceable-stamp-archive

  7. It hardly made the news except in stamp collecting circles,

    Gordon Crovitz called the UN ‘a Third World Kleptocracy’. Too true.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>