Home » Update on the Hawaii nuclear false alarm

Comments

Update on the Hawaii nuclear false alarm — 17 Comments

  1. I guess the moral of the story is if you’re interested in launching a missile at Hawaii do it at a shift change.

  2. It amazes me how much damage can be done because of a miscommunication. “This is not a drill.” Really! Plus, how is it that the shmuck who made the decision to do this pop drill, wasn’t able to pick up the phone and dial a couple TV stations and radio stations and stop the panic?

    I just saw a program on the investigation of the air disaster at Tenerife airport many years ago that killed over 500 people. The controller and pilots used the word “takeoff” for taxiing into position for takeoff, asking or announcing being in position for takeoff, and finally having authorization for actual takeoff.

    The pilot mistook one of those earlier “takeoffs” for authorization which he did not have. Now the word “departure” is used exclusively, except for final authorization for takeoff.

  3. TommyJay,

    I watched that ‘Air Disasters’ episode on the collision in the Canary Islands also. It really is amazing how many major air disasters seem to be partly or wholly caused by miscommunication or language issues.

    And younger pilots deferring to older ones seems to be a running theme also.

  4. For something this serious they should have a slightly watered down version of the two man rule to prevent stupid mistakes.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-man_rule

    A friend of mine avoided service in Viet Nam by joining the Airforce and was assigned to a Minuteman silo.

    They all had to pass a psychological exam. If I remember correctly, they were each given a side arm to be used in case the other operator went nuts.

    Yes, the WaPo is covering up for a woman who screwed up. Democracy dies in Darkness and we’re doing our best to kill it.

  5. Maybe the WaPoo is so woke that specifying gender in pronouns is out, out, out. Or maybe the worker has a split personality and thinks he/she is they. Or is transgender and in transition. Or identifies as twins. Who are we to judge?

  6. Seems to me using ‘they’ is done to protect the identity of the worker by, in part, not specifying that person’s gender.

    Otherwise, this is just more evidence for my argument that government entities and their staffs are dangerously incompetent.

  7. And apparently the mysterious ‘they’ has screwed up previous drills involving fire and tsunami warnings. And still employed. Can’t beat government work.

  8. As far as communicating, the new use of “they” as an English language gender neutral singular pronoun is really confusing. I read it to mean a slew of people, rather than a single person.

    Could also be that the wapo article is actually being specific. By being so carefully PC, maybe ‘they’ inadvertently outed an individual who militantly identifies as nongender conforming, unless there are several.

  9. Perhaps the gender traits (e.g. orientation) are uncorrelated with the genetic sex, which in the age of political congruence (“=”), is cause for progressive confusion.

  10. I worked in emergency response situations. Amber Alerts, Silver Alerts, and I would think Missile Alerts all require more than 1 person to vett before sending out. It is the rule of 2 or 3, depending on your Standard operating Processes. One person must verify what you are doing, and another signs off. This is common practice. There is generally a few checks.

  11. I believe that news reports from other outlets more informative than WaPoo have identified “they” as “he”. WaPoo appears to be leading a race to the bottom.

  12. “So “Hawaii officials” either lied about it or didn’t even know what had happened. Fancy that.”

    Yep, and with this latest version of the story they went from “not reassuring” to downright “what they heck are they doing?”.

  13. So “Hawaii officials” either lied about it or didn’t even know what had happened.

    Both options logically-and-morally equate to “they lied about it”.

  14. Or (more likely, I think) are they shielding us from knowledge of the worker’s [sex] …

    That’s how it seems to me.

  15. Speaking of the abuse of “they” and other pronouns real and fake, and of words in general:

    “If you use the language rules that your ideological opponent demands that you use, you cede the territory to them. “

    Thus Jordan Peterson to Mark Steyn, at 6:13 into their discussion of legal constraints and requirements on language in order to force ideology on people. The initiatives and statutes regarding such use are steps on the road to totalitarianism — starting with the loss of free speech, but there is much more to be lost as we travel down that road.

    (As for the misuse of “they” with a singular antecedent, that has been a standard mistake for at least the nearly 3/4-century that I’ve been speaking American English like a native. I note that Dr. Peterson himself makes the error, in this very quote! *g* But in standard parlance it’s just that — a mistake, not purposeful, and certainly not a required abuse of the word.)

    “The Mark Steyn Show with Jordan Peterson,” published 4/13/17, at

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4obxH2vSms

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>