Home » “Cornhead” writes about Bobby Jindal’s Iowa speech

Comments

“Cornhead” writes about Bobby Jindal’s Iowa speech — 12 Comments

  1. Hot potato – hot patootie…

    Who ever wins gets the shaft of all the convergences of the laws which delayed their outcomes till AFTER the current president.

  2. Donald Trump’s campaign stop in Mobile could prompt a venue change as more people have registered for tickets online than what the Civic Center’s Theater can hold, a SMG official said Wednesday. Bob Brazier, general manager of the Mobile Civic Center and the Arthur R. Outlaw Mobile Convention Center, said “it appears” the attendance during Trump rally “will outgrow” the theater’s 1,950 capacity.

  3. Good job Cornhead. I like Governor Jindal but don’t think it’s his time yet.

  4. The pop icon railed on Trump in a series of tweets Cher probably won’t be voting for Donald Trump in 2016. The billionaire host of “The Celebrity Apprentice” announced his presidential bid on Tuesday, and the pop icon was not happy about it. In a series of Tweets, Cher took Trump to task, declaring him a “Loudmouth *sshole, Who’s terrified of Windy Days.” “Donald Trump Can’t come up with a hairstyle that looks human,how can he come up with a plan to defeat ISIS,” she wrote in a reply to another user. Despite her assertion that the only state Trump

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-

    what makes these people think that when things are fully communist they will have a place at the table? really?

    hey cher, how many communist chinese and soviet russian performers do you know the names of (not defectors)????

    doesnt she know that if things DO change there is no place for a half naked older wingnut full of hate anymore?

  5. Thom Hartmann, a paid agent of the Russian government’s main propaganda channel, Russia Today (RT) television, is strongly supporting career politician and socialist Bernie Sanders for U.S. president. “Bernie Sanders could be the next FDR,” he says. But it might be more accurate to say that Sanders could be another Alger Hiss, the Russian agent who served FDR as his top aide and helped create the United Nations. Before examining the curious history of “Bolshevik Bernie,” as analyst Trevor Loudon calls him, Hartmann’s service to the Kremlin is worth a look.

  6. I thought Jindal did very well in the first debate session with Carly. They were the only two that shined. I actually learned some things about what Jindal has accomplished in Louisiana, and it was impressive stuff. I am hoping he can stick it out awhile longer to see where he might go in his candidacy.

    I find it hilarious that the press are ignoring the historic nature of his candidacy (first Indian-American running for President). I think most younger voters are not stupid and can see for themselves that the Republicans have a large variety of candidates…older, younger, different races…while the Democrats have a bunch of old white people…mostly men.

  7. K-E

    Bobby never plays the race/ethnic card and in his stump speech he says he wants to get rid of the whole hypenanated American concept and usage in the language.

  8. Carly is a mess… her lucent tech rise was created by having lucent loan money to a small company who took lucents money and bought lucent tech. the books were cooked, the thing collapsed.

    then she went to hp, and turned it into a defunct printer cartridge company rather than be up there with cisco and others as she negated that kind of development

    then out of there she went again..

    the woman is a horrid person whose existence is a dream of pr and not at all true if you dig. she is a leftist elitist feminist… as a feminist that should tell you everything since feminism today is a communist ideology since the 60s and its WELL documented.

    most of the others are sell outs and cant run crap cause they have never run crap… they are political hacks who do deals for great sums and leave for the parachuts.

    fiorina was a secretary who ended up with a 25 million golden parachute for her crapola at lucent.

    from there its been dirty pool and bs with great pr hiding it all..

    Jindal is a harvard/oxford/yale/rhodes scholar… so you can bet that he is a leftist in sheeps clothing!!!!! or else he could not succeed in those places… he is not a member of skull and bones or any of the special orgs that lead to presidencies, and he has very little support financially compared to others. his grandfather was a banker, and involved with who and what as bankers in the asian area where obamas mom and others in related business did microloans?

    Humanitarians across the world support microfinance as a means to escape the oppression of poverty. Microfinance is not a recent phenomenon: I recently read a great piece in the Independent Online talking about President Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, and how she backed microfinance during her career as a social anthropologist, living and working in Indonesia in the 1960s.

    jindals grandrather was part of that same system back in the late 50s at the same time that other very wealthy people were inserting themselves into the politics of that area by pretending to do good works with ngos (before they were called that)…

    the same thing that spawned obama is the same thing that jindal comes from…

    birds of a feather…

  9. I mentioned before that I tuned into Medved’s radio show one day in the middle of an interview with a conservative, but he didn’t mention his name until the end. I listened to all the answers that interviewee was giving and thought, “Wow, who is this guy? He’s saying all the things I believe.” I thought he had a good voice, a well modulated presentation, and a great sense of humor. Since I learned it was Jindal at the end of the interview, I have watched him carefully. I like him a lot and wonder why he’s not catching on with others. (I do admit to having different tastes than the multitudes. 🙂 ) His record is as good as any of the governors and he has some good specific ideas. If he won the nomination, I would happily vote for him.

  10. this is about the time the Jindal’s family was very successful in the past!!!!!!

    The Mitrokhin Archives II from an Indian Perspective: A Review Article

    Everyone in the 1970s and through the 1980s knew of the tight grip around New Delhi’s policy-making circles of top bureaucrats, academics, journalists etc who were blatantly and incorrigibly pro-Soviet, some being active communists or fellow- travellers.

    Some of those complaining today know fully well that a cardinal implicit reason the CPI(M) broke from its parent party had to do precisely with Moscow’s control of the CPI. Moreover, while it might have been newsworthy when the KGB honey-trapped a senior diplomat or a junior cipher clerk in the Indian Embassy now and then, there were also hundreds of public sector bureaucrats, military personnel, journalists, technology professors, writers, artists, dancers et al who were treated most hospitably by the Soviet state — getting freebies flying to Soviet cities, being greeted by singing Young Pioneers, touring L’Hermitage with Intourist, receiving dollar honoraria and splendid gifts, sitting in on “technical training”, even receiving bogus Soviet doctoral degrees to allow themselves to be called “Dr” etc.

    Purchasing influence in New Delhi or any other capital city has never been merely a crude matter of cash-filled suitcases sloshing around in the middle of the night.

    Much of what Mitrokhin’s material says about the KGB’s penetration of India should, candidly speaking, generate but a desultory yawn from us —although even this book seems not to know that Narasimha Rao’s infamous, catastrophically damaging remarks in August 1991, in favour of the abortive KGB coup led by Kryuchkov against Gorbachev and Yeltsin, had been prompted by a staunchly pro-Soviet retired Indian diplomat at his side long-associated with the CPI.

    Yes there are many titbits in this book that may be of interest from an Indian perspective – such as that Sanjay Gandhi’s entourage contained both a Soviet and an American mole in it (where are they now?).

    But what may be far more interesting to us today is what can be deduced from what Mitrokhin is silent about. For example, India and the Soviets were close allies in 1971 when Kissinger had teamed up with Yahya Khan and Bhutto to send Nixon to China.

    so a set of successful bankers and academics from india has a child who is completely western and not at all influenced by the bath they had in the period before coming to the US and somehow, he rockets to prominance?

    yeah… right… thats like taking a bath in a cesspool and coming up clean as a whistle…

  11. If American picked up parts of the Mongol succession, they would give military and political units to these nominees and see which one has the best achievements after X period of time with them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>