Home » Late evidence dump in Chauvin trial, and prosecution allowed to recall its own witness who ends up testifying on new evidence after defense has rested and its witness has gone home [see ADDENDUM below]

Comments

Late evidence dump in Chauvin trial, and prosecution allowed to recall its own witness who ends up testifying on <i>new evidence</i> after defense has rested and its witness has gone home [see ADDENDUM below] — 19 Comments

  1. It seems likely that there will indeed be riots, no matter the verdict. That this is even remotely possible clearly constitutes an indictment of the current state of criminal (in)justice in our moribund republic, but the eagerness of the DOJ to pour endless money and to wield punitive charges against hundreds of the “domestic terrorists” of January 6th (likened by Schumer to Pearl Harbor and by many to 9/11) proves, beyond any reasonable doubt, that we now have “one nation with two very different systems of justice” (the topic of Tucker’s excellent monologue yesterday on the DOJ’s shameful failure over the murder of Ashli Babbitt). A system which treats its ideological allies leniently, while imposing draconian penalties upon its enemies, represents nothing but “anarcho-tyranny.”

  2. I watched the trial today, and I was stunned at the proceedings. This plainly should have been declared a mistrial. I’m speechless.

  3. 12 or 13 days for this to go to the jury. This seems very quick for such a high profile trial. Seems like ALL parties involved want out of this ASAP.

  4. First I guess the prosecution was trying to overwhelm the Defense hoping for a mistake.
    Second not convinced a judge wouldn’t want a quick conviction and if it was overturned later he is off the hook for the millions of damage coming.
    Three very sadly these police trials in Leftist cities are going to be more common.

  5. Heads we win, tails you lose has an expiration date. A date quickly approaching.

  6. The mob is hovering over this trial. Everyone knows it. No one can say it. “Wouldn’t be prudent.”

    This is what mob rule looks like. Not a pretty sight. Can only stopped by leaders at the mayoral and governor level. They control law enforcement and keeping the peace. If it takes declaring martial law, then that’s what they should do. But no Democrat will do it. Remember that and share it when election time rolls around.

  7. Welcome to the new World. They will not prosecute “Them” or require cash bond, but they will bankrupt “You” and lock “You” up for endless appeals. Plan ahead. I think it is called “Lawfare”.

    Note: Daunte. He was allowed to run free after robbery and weapons charges but the Officer will be bankrupted.

    New Rules for “normies”. You will have limited options. Sounds like murder (self defense) and hurting an attacker’s feelings by saying “No!” will have the same penalty. And, “God Forbid”, the wayward “child” trips on a loose bit of carpeting while he is in a dejected state.

    But, we are all safe from Daunte…… Just saying.

  8. There were (believable) rumors that John Roberts refused to hear the Pennsylvania election fraud case because he feared the riots that would ensue.

    In a riot, there is no order. And without “order,” there can be no law.

  9. The judge can criticize himself by fessing up to allow the elements for a mistrial were his fault.
    But. that means he didn’t do anything, one way or another, with regard to the verdict. Possibly the safest place to be.

  10. There may be rumors that John Roberts is not courageous.

    https://www.lyricsmania.com/if_i_only_had_the_nerve_lyrics_wizard_of_oz_the.html

    “(Cowardly Lion)
    Yeah, it’s sad, believe me Missy
    When you’re born to be a sissy
    Without the vim and verve
    But I could show my prowess
    Be a lion, not a mowess
    If I only had the nerve

    I’m afraid there’s no denyin’
    I’m just a dandylion
    A fate I don’t deserve
    I’d be brave as a blizzard”

    Not politicly correct, to be sure.

  11. Funny om should bring up the lyrics to “If I Only Had The Nerve.”

    Watching Joe Biden recently, I was struck by how squinty and vacant and/or a artificial he looked. I think I’ll call him Scarecrow Joe; if he only had a brain …

    I could think of things I’d never
    Thunk before,
    And then I’d sit down and think some more.

    If I only had a brain.

  12. But the Scarecrow wasn’t dishonest and tryin to put the moves on Dorothy. C’mon man! 🙂

    Dystopian Oz, a fine mess we’ve gotten ourselves into.

  13. Please pardon my language but the prosecution and the judge are pussies; they are cowed by the threats of violence from the BLM crew. They will willingly sacrifice justice for peace. Of course, they will get neither.

  14. When a mistrial is declared due to prosecutorial misconduct that is the end of the game–the result is an acquittal. Double jeopardy prevents the prosecution from starting over. Given the consequences of declaring a mistrial it is extremely unlikely that the judge will declare one.

  15. I was surprised that the defense was resting its case so early and with so few expert witnesses called. Was that because no expert witnesses wanted their name within the same time zone ad this case? No idea.

    But what I do find interesting is that the prosecution’s medical expert ended up testifying that Floyd’s O2 sat was at 98%. There is no testimony so far that explains how Floyd’s oxygen levels were healthy at the time of death when the prosecution argued that the cause of death was positional asphyxia and resultant low oxygen levels. I’m no medical expert, but then again, neither is the jury. This seems to be a massive hole in the state’s case.

    Did the defense see the opening here, banking on making its case during closing arguments with this seeming contradiction? I’m not privy to the witness list, so I don’t know if he called it earlier than planned, but the prosecution’s case seems to be on thin ice right now, at best.

    I don’t see how this ends up being anything other than a hung jury (acquittal ain’t happenin’ after watching that voir dire), or anything more than guilty on two charges at most, with strong grounds for appeal.

    As for the inevitable riots? Good. Let them continue to tear up the Democrat cities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>